107 replies to this topic

[Clint Steel]

I agree, the head is a big let down. One of the reasons I generally don't advocate pre purchases based on concept art (though I did pick up this package), since the Modelers so often change major proportions. The Dire Wolf is probably the biggest disappointment going from concept to model. Not to say it doesn't go the other way sometimes, like the Raven, and so far the Grasshopper looks better than the concept.

[MikeBend]

We had too few synonims of ugly and disgusting, but then PGI stood up for the challenge. Thanks to them we can now call someone "Ugly as Gargoyle Prime", "Ugly as Enforcer head", "Disgusting as K2 PPCs" and tell people "Get your Wang fixed!"

Haters gonna hate, but a problem is there - that thing "slightly resembles" concept art. As if the modeler only saw it once and then recreated it from memory.

As much as i want to see all modeling letdowns fixed, i dont think we will see it in near future. Maybe not even ever.

[Sarlic]

Didn't Russ told on Twitter he was fine with it?

Then why keep on argueing...

[SnagaDance]

While I agree that these changes would make the mech look better..................calling them 'Major Issues'.....

[Hit the Deck]

If Alex provided an orthographic (complete 360 degree view) drawing of the Enforcer to PGI, how could the 3D model look so far off? Their modelers couldn't be that bad at translating. So it leaves us with that PGI decided to make the 3D model somewhat different from the concept art. But why?

[Water Bear]

I own ENFs. I agree the in game model looks a bit worse than the concept art, but I..just...don't...care.

[Hillslam]

PGI, do these jeans make me look fat?

[Clint Steel]

Water Bear, on 13 March 2015 - 08:06 AM, said:

I own ENFs. I agree the in game model looks a bit worse than the concept art, but I..just...don't...care.

Some of us are more vain than other it seems