Jump to content

Switching Your Faction Needs Work.


5 replies to this topic

#1 nehebkau

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,386 posts
  • LocationIn a water-rights dispute with a Beaver

Posted 13 February 2015 - 11:52 AM

Work needs to be done on the whole faction system. Right now a few larger groups are taking advantage of the faction system to 'game' the system swapping factions in order to pursue a larger agenda. While not against the rules of the game Its really not in the spirit of what CW was intended to represent.

I think choosing a faction duration isn't working and in the release should be adjusted in some way to prevent the faction jumping that we are seeing right now -- most specifically in regards to the clans who, according to cannon, are held to a much higher moral and cultural standard than Inner-sphere citizens.

One thing I thought might work is having a regularly scheduled 'Moving Day' rather then choosing the length of service and, having a true merc faction that can defend anywhere in IS but not initiate any attacks. (don't know if this is a good or bad idea just putting it out there)

Problem I see is that in the future you are going to inevitably end-up with a bunch of jerks trying to poison the game for the rest of the players in the current system.

#2 Davers

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,886 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationCanada

Posted 13 February 2015 - 12:14 PM

The groups aren't 'taking advantage' of the faction system any more than a person waiting for an item to be on sale before they buy it. Maybe the faction system is doing exactly what PGI wants it to do? They created a system where changing factions is MUCH more rewarding than staying only with one.

Isn't the real question "What happened to PGI's planned 'Loyalist Life'?"

#3 Jacob Side

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 390 posts

Posted 13 February 2015 - 12:17 PM

Bigger question is what happened to the whole presentation done at the launch event?

#4 nehebkau

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,386 posts
  • LocationIn a water-rights dispute with a Beaver

Posted 13 February 2015 - 01:12 PM

I can just see the Faction system being abused when it is out of beta.... Right now it's not really abuse its flaw-testing right? :) none the less I can see it getting way out of hand specially when you factor in alt-accounts.

#5 ApolloKaras

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,974 posts
  • LocationSeattle, Washington

Posted 13 February 2015 - 01:26 PM

I'm confused as to the meaning of '..Larger agenda..', can you clarify?

#6 Davers

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,886 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationCanada

Posted 13 February 2015 - 02:05 PM

View PostSaxie, on 13 February 2015 - 01:26 PM, said:

I'm confused as to the meaning of '..Larger agenda..', can you clarify?

Any agenda larger than the 13 worlds of the FFR.





3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users