Papertarget, on 30 June 2012 - 02:02 AM, said:
Interesting. From the initial post, I determined that someone was trolling the forum members, and in the process they were also trying to troll the Admins. The post stated that the Admins have let the forums become unruly, and "corrupt (though the corruption seems to be just a word that was thrown in to create even more discord and inaccuracy...) He states that he wishes that he could be an Admin, so he could "clean up" the forums, by doing the very thing that was done to him for the same reasons that he gives that his post/thread was deleted.
In another post that he did, he said he was intentionally trying to troll the forums and get hostile responses. When he was able to get some fairly calm flames (and I am sorry, but they ARE calm, and not very "flamey",) he then points to them as proof that he is right about people not being very respectful in the forums. So, considering the whole thread is a direct provocation to the members of the forum, how can the OP pass judgement on the forums being disrespectful, as this is a prime example of disrespect to the forum members?
This is a round argument that has no real basis in reality. It is instead a blatant attempt to get attention, and it has worked. However, the major point that that the OP is missing, is that it really doesn't matter, except that it will make anything he has to say that MAY have content in the future, will not be taken seriously.
Please people. Let us refrain from feeding the Troll. He wants to be important, and the only way he thinks he can, is to cause contention and strife in the community.
AH your the intellectual troll, very rare, good when cooked medium rare with steamed broccoli with cheese!