131 replies to this topic

[Xandre Blackheart]

Bwa ha h... oh ****. you're serious?

BWA HA HA HAH HAH - RUPTURE

OW OW OW.

[Rychard Starheart]

Praetorians, on 30 June 2012 - 01:22 AM, said:

so you think that morality/civility is optional ... even if its in the forum rules? ...

you cannot force your own 'happy happy joy joy, lets all be friends' idea of civility on others, over the internet, in a third parties personal web space.

[Zso Sahal]

Praetorians, on 30 June 2012 - 01:22 AM, said:

so you think that morality/civility is optional ... even if its in the forum rules? ...

No, however I realize that my concept of morality and civility do not necessarily align to the worlds. It would be arrogant of me to think that I set the bar for either.

Short of threats of physical violence, I'm open to any type of debate. B/c I'd rather try and understand the other side of the table than ignore them out of hand b/c I don't find them to be civilized. That is merely limiting my own ability to learn.

[Subzero Ray]

Zso Sahal, on 30 June 2012 - 01:21 AM, said:

Ok, time to nuke this thread







Game ovah!!!

This post successfully triggered its desired effect. This thread will no longer be the same from this moment forward.

Edited by Subzero Ray, 30 June 2012 - 01:26 AM.

[Bluey]

Praetorians, on 30 June 2012 - 12:23 AM, said:

i do belive that there are to many trolls on forums my previous post will probably be taken down as it causes unrest. well stop looking at the topics and look at the posts after them many are negitive rude or down right disrespectful.. this comunity is unrest there has not been a good thread for a while.

Enjoy

Dont bother with complaining about spelling you realy need to find something else than spelling to jump on

Devs im sorry but your forum is corrupt...

So says the slave to the free man.

[Birddog FAC]

to recap i guess its this simple the old saying do unto others as you want them to do unto you... in otherwords be respectful to get respect. this thread does not follow that saying ... i did it intentionaly. to prove a point... whiners are whiners but just because you see them that way does not mean you have to act the *** and go off.. this thread was a general provocation... agressive responces were what i was looking for. now that said how much different do the responces given in this thread differ then in other threads... unfortunately not much ... that is what i am trying to point out.

[Rychard Starheart]

Zso Sahal, on 30 June 2012 - 01:25 AM, said:

No, however I realize that my concept of morality and civility do not necessarily align to the worlds. It would be arrogant of me to think that I set the bar for either.

Short of threats of physical violence, I'm open to any type of debate. B/c I'd rather try and understand the other side of the table than ignore them out of hand b/c I don't find them to be civilized. That is merely limiting my own ability to learn.

but... but... hes in college, he already knows everything there is to know!

Praetorians, on 30 June 2012 - 01:26 AM, said:

to recap i guess its this simple the old saying do unto others as you want them to do unto you... in otherwords be respectful to get respect. this thread does not follow that saying ... i did it intentionaly. to prove a point... whiners are whiners but just because you see them that way does not mean you have to act the *** and go off.. this thread was a general provocation... agressive responces were what i was looking for. now that said how much different do the responces given in this thread differ then in other threads... unfortunately not much ... that is what i am trying to point out.

have you ever run across the old saying "Every time you point a finger at someone else, there are four more pointing right back at you." ?

Edited by Rychard Starheart, 30 June 2012 - 01:28 AM.

[Shiinore]

Praetorians, on 30 June 2012 - 01:26 AM, said:

to recap i guess its this simple the old saying do unto others as you want them to do unto you... in otherwords be respectful to get respect. this thread does not follow that saying ... i did it intentionaly. to prove a point... whiners are whiners but just because you see them that way does not mean you have to act the *** and go off.. this thread was a general provocation... agressive responces were what i was looking for. now that said how much different do the responces given in this thread differ then in other threads... unfortunately not much ... that is what i am trying to point out.

It's just going to get locked.
There still isn't anyone who cares.

What did you achieve, exactly?

[Greyrook]

This is getting (also, started out as) way too heavy handed for it being on a forum for a videogame about walking tanks. Nonetheless, the thread continues as if it is presenting or discussing a problem that actually matters:

[Birddog FAC]

Zso Sahal, on 30 June 2012 - 01:25 AM, said:

No, however I realize that my concept of morality and civility do not necessarily align to the worlds. It would be arrogant of me to think that I set the bar for either.

Short of threats of physical violence, I'm open to any type of debate. B/c I'd rather try and understand the other side of the table than ignore them out of hand b/c I don't find them to be civilized. That is merely limiting my own ability to learn.

i agree with this quote but i find demeaning belittling and attack replys not actual debate. just strait rude. and those type of comments should not be tollerated. i would happily spend my free time running through the forums deleting those kind of threads no problem.


And yes im sure there a quite a few spelling errors

[Zso Sahal]

So you admit I was right, and that your previous 3 threads have had no merit in regards to their contents.

[Birddog FAC]

Rychard Starheart, on 30 June 2012 - 01:26 AM, said:

but... but... hes in college, he already knows everything there is to know!





have you ever run across the old saying "Every time you point a finger at someone else, there are four more pointing right back at you." ?

that is in accurate because there are only 3 first second thats just a responce to the first comment... an old school comeback.

Zso Sahal, on 30 June 2012 - 01:30 AM, said:

So you admit I was right, and that your previous 3 threads have had no merit in regards to their contents.

no they had merrit but they may not have been properly expressed

Greyrook, on 30 June 2012 - 01:27 AM, said:

This is getting (also, started out as) way too heavy handed for it being on a forum for a videogame about walking tanks. Nonetheless, the thread continues as if it is presenting or discussing a problem that actually matters:

actualy the topic matters as it reflects on the player base and that does include you. your not giving yourself a good showing btw

[Subzero Ray]

Praetorians, on 30 June 2012 - 01:31 AM, said:

that is in accurate because there are only 3 first second thats just a responce to the first comment... an old school comeback.



no they had merrit but they may not have been properly expressed

I hate to be the new ****** of this thread but...

I legitimately have no idea what you just said.

[Rychard Starheart]

Greyrook, on 30 June 2012 - 01:27 AM, said:

This is getting (also, started out as) way too heavy handed for it being on a forum for a videogame about walking tanks. Nonetheless, the thread continues as if it is presenting or discussing a problem that actually matters:

it only matters to the bleeding heart who thinks they can dictate their own tiny world view to the perceived un-washed, ignorent masses.

Subzero Ray, on 30 June 2012 - 01:33 AM, said:

I hate to be the new ****** of this thread but...

I legitimately have no idea what you just said.

your not the only one, bro

Edited by Rychard Starheart, 30 June 2012 - 01:34 AM.

[Zso Sahal]

Praetorians, on 30 June 2012 - 01:30 AM, said:

i agree with this quote but i find demeaning belittling and attack replys not actual debate. just strait rude. and those type of comments should not be tollerated. i would happily spend my free time running through the forums deleting those kind of threads no problem.

Lets break this down;

I agree with this but... So, you're not agreeing.

i find demeaning belittling and attack replys not actual debate. To be blunt, who cares?

and those type of comments should not be tollerated. According to you, b/c you got offended. See point #2.

i would happily spend my free time running through the forums deleting those kind of threads no problem. Please never moderate a forum. Unless its in China.

[Birddog FAC]

Subzero Ray, on 30 June 2012 - 01:33 AM, said:

I hate to be the new ****** of this thread but...

I legitimately have no idea what you just said.

the thumb is not a finger so only 3 fingers are pointing back at you .... first part

second part is just a way for people who are being pointed out to try to turn the tides more of a comeback than an saying...

Rychard Starheart, on 30 June 2012 - 01:33 AM, said:

it only matters to the bleeding heart who thinks they can dictate their own tiny world view to the perceived un-washed, ignorent masses.





your not the only one, bro

right but being rude is all good becaue your hiding behind your computer screen ... im just saying that people should treat each other the same way as they would if they were actualy talking with each other... and that people like you are constantly outta line with thier comments.

[Bluey]

Only think I know about devs and mods
They always cared about my opinion and always protected me from any sort of harressment
due to my English being not so good or myself being a furry also when I did a mistake I was
gentle warned about it and recieved a pm from moderator he removed content on my behalf so I wont get in trouble.

Hell ; My first topic was answered by Russ himself.

Which part of corruption your talking about

Edited by Bluey, 30 June 2012 - 01:38 AM.

[Birddog FAC]

Zso Sahal, on 30 June 2012 - 01:34 AM, said:

Lets break this down;

I agree with this but... So, you're not agreeing.

i find demeaning belittling and attack replys not actual debate. To be blunt, who cares?

and those type of comments should not be tollerated. According to you, b/c you got offended. See point #2.

i would happily spend my free time running through the forums deleting those kind of threads no problem. Please never moderate a forum. Unless its in China.

lol read the forum rules they expect respect .. not many show it ... i havent been ... but then again this topic was not posted with the intent of being respectful.

[Greyrook]

Praetorians, on 30 June 2012 - 01:33 AM, said:

that is in accurate because there are only 3 first second thats just a responce to the first comment... an old school comeback.



no they had merrit but they may not have been properly expressed



actualy the topic matters as it reflects on the player base and that does include you. your not giving yourself a good showing btw

I don't know what you mean by showing. I'm tired though, so I don't really care


Also I've forgotten what you're supposed to be defending for the masses here. Something about the devs not moderating or something?

Edited by Greyrook, 30 June 2012 - 01:41 AM.

[Birddog FAC]

Bluey, on 30 June 2012 - 01:38 AM, said:

Only think I know about devs and mods
They always cared about my opinion and always protected me from any sort of harressment
due to my English being not so good or myself being a furry also when I did a mistake I was
gentle warned about it and recieved a pm from moderator he removed content on my behalf so I wont get in trouble.

Hell ; My first topic was answered by Russ himself.

Which part of corruption your talking about

corruption is not the right word i should go back and adjust that... its more along the lines of the forum users are alowed to run amuk while only the main posters are moderated... for the most part

but corruption is an eye catcher so i will probably leave it there

Edited by Praetorians, 30 June 2012 - 01:41 AM.