Jump to content

Eisenfaust


7 replies to this topic

#1 Corpral ellenbogen

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 38 posts
  • LocationChampion PA

Posted 27 February 2015 - 11:34 AM

I was looking at battle mechs that id like to see in the game that where obscure and this one actualy might fit the bill its realeased in 2515 and you could say you found a cash of them so the plasma rifle could be introduced as a form of early found los tech also if anyone has any redesign art that be cool http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Eisenfaust

#2 mogs01gt

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • 4,292 posts
  • LocationOhio

Posted 27 February 2015 - 11:41 AM

That mech would get eaten alive in MWO.

#3 Aethon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • 2,037 posts
  • LocationSt. Louis, Niles, Kerensky Cluster

Posted 27 February 2015 - 12:51 PM

View PostCorpral ellenbogen, on 27 February 2015 - 11:34 AM, said:

I was looking at battle mechs that id like to see in the game that where obscure and this one actualy might fit the bill its realeased in 2515 and you could say you found a cash of them so the plasma rifle could be introduced as a form of early found los tech also if anyone has any redesign art that be cool http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Eisenfaust


This mech was not produced until a long way into the future; it only existed in the past as a failed prototype.

View Postmogs01gt, on 27 February 2015 - 11:41 AM, said:

That mech would get eaten alive in MWO.


By all accounts, so should the Firestarter. Instead, it was changed from an anti-infantry mech into a ridiculously good gunboat. PGI can make anything good, the way they do quirks and additional weapon hardpoints.

#4 Wingbreaker

    Troubadour

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Sureshot
  • The Sureshot
  • 1,724 posts
  • LocationThe city that care forgot

Posted 27 February 2015 - 12:52 PM

A minor issue.

#5 mogs01gt

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • 4,292 posts
  • LocationOhio

Posted 27 February 2015 - 12:55 PM

View PostAethon, on 27 February 2015 - 12:51 PM, said:

By all accounts, so should the Firestarter. Instead, it was changed from an anti-infantry mech into a ridiculously good gunboat. PGI can make anything good, the way they do quirks and additional weapon hardpoints.

umm WTF r u talking about...The FS9 can mount a largeer engine compared to the Faust, the FS9 is humanoid therefore can use built in PGI hitboxe exploits and the Faust is a medium mech....It wont have the size exploits to use...It will get wrekt!

Edited by mogs01gt, 27 February 2015 - 12:56 PM.


#6 DONTOR

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,806 posts
  • LocationStuck on a piece of Commando in my Ice Ferret

Posted 27 February 2015 - 02:50 PM

It does look interesting, and a plasma rifle would be a fun addition!

#7 the hedgehog

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 80 posts

Posted 27 February 2015 - 03:04 PM

As a mostly clan mech owner I would try and get this. looks awesome. kinda a mini marauder.

#8 Aethon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • 2,037 posts
  • LocationSt. Louis, Niles, Kerensky Cluster

Posted 27 February 2015 - 03:04 PM

View Postmogs01gt, on 27 February 2015 - 12:55 PM, said:

umm WTF r u talking about...The FS9 can mount a largeer engine compared to the Faust, the FS9 is humanoid therefore can use built in PGI hitboxe exploits and the Faust is a medium mech....It wont have the size exploits to use...It will get wrekt!


PGI would likely give it more weapon hardpoints, and it will pack more armor anyway, due to its higher weight. Do not take canonical sizes to count, anyway, because the in-game sizes tend to vary drastically. In short, do not discount PGI's ability to turn an otherwise useless mech into something amazing, and vice-versa (see Awesome for example).

That said, it does not exist for a long time anyway, so it is a moot point.





3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users