1
Im going to go with the Jenner, why? There are a few reasons:
-While the other 'mechs are nice, I find many of them to have major (in my opinion) flaws, the hunchback for example relies mainly on the large cannon on its shoulder, an easy target. Also, its left torso is empty as such most players with stock it with ammo and heatsinks, making it predictable and easy to cripple. The Catapault has a very large protruding cockpit making it susceptible to headshots, and the missle launchers are easy to take out, most players would stock ammo either in the arms itself or in the torso, also making it predictable. Finally, the Atlas, this one is a little less predictable then the others its sheer size makes its ammo placement unpredictable, and its frontal armor makes it hard incapacitate, but its strength is also its weakness, it's a large, slow target, and assuming its entire skull counts as the cockpit (and not just the left eye) it would be easy to headshot, if not, its massive legs would be easy to cripple to allow an easier time to attack the backside
-The Jenner is the lightest, and cheapest 'mech of the four, because of this its repair costs are bound to be lower, also, it isn't very reliant on ammo based weapons, which means it will net me the most out of the 25% C-bill booster. Though the Jenner is not without weakness, its thin armor makes it easy to take out, and its lack of weapons could give it a hard time taking down other 'mechs without assistance. Though I feel these shortcomings are remedied by its high speed and small frame
Which 'mech are you choosing?
Edited by Canary, 30 June 2012 - 02:44 PM.
That was my first reaction when I saw the Mechs on offer (though if I could have a second I'd take the Catapult too).
