Jump to content

<<(!final Review!)>> 70T. Battle - Grasshopper Vs. Cataphract: Surface Area

Balance BattleMechs Gameplay

91 replies to this topic

#81 Burktross

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • 3,663 posts
  • LocationStill in closed beta

Posted 16 March 2015 - 10:48 AM

View PostAUSwarrior24, on 16 March 2015 - 01:12 AM, said:

If the Grasshopper was resized height wise according to that chart, or at least in relation to MW:O's sizing of the Banshee, it would look like this:

Posted Image

While there's certainly a difference and it seems somewhat more natural, the size difference... isn't that big. I really think we'll have to see how it handles in game.

This would be glorious

__________________________________________

I think I'll try and get two more comparisons in today. One for targeting profile, another for leg size.

Edited by Burktross, 16 March 2015 - 10:52 AM.


#82 mogs01gt

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • 4,292 posts
  • LocationOhio

Posted 16 March 2015 - 10:50 AM

Luckily the Hopper has higher mounted arm hardpoints. It isnt going to have the same issues that the Summoner does with its high cockpit and low mounted arm hardpoints.

This mech will probably outperform the Summoner.

Edited by mogs01gt, 16 March 2015 - 10:50 AM.


#83 Burktross

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • 3,663 posts
  • LocationStill in closed beta

Posted 16 March 2015 - 10:52 AM

View Postmogs01gt, on 16 March 2015 - 10:50 AM, said:

Luckily the Hopper has higher mounted arm hardpoints. It isnt going to have the same issues that the Summoner does with its high cockpit and low mounted arm hardpoints.

This mech will probably outperform the Summoner.

That's not saying much...

#84 mogs01gt

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • 4,292 posts
  • LocationOhio

Posted 16 March 2015 - 10:54 AM

View PostBurktross, on 16 March 2015 - 10:52 AM, said:

That's not saying much...

LMAO my post was a bit of a stab at my poor Summoner. :P

Someone post up a picture with the Hopper next to a Treb.

Edited by mogs01gt, 16 March 2015 - 10:55 AM.


#85 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 16 March 2015 - 11:02 AM

View Postmogs01gt, on 16 March 2015 - 10:54 AM, said:

LMAO my post was a bit of a stab at my poor Summoner. :P

Someone post up a picture with the Hopper next to a Treb.

oh stop that, I have it on good authority, GOOD AUTHORITY, mind you, that the SMN has at least one halfway decent "Meta-ish" build, and thus it's OK.

#86 Burktross

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • 3,663 posts
  • LocationStill in closed beta

Posted 16 March 2015 - 11:28 AM

Updating OP with this image. Leg calculations are done. Grasshopper might not be bad after all!
Posted Image

#87 Hit the Deck

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,677 posts
  • LocationIndonesia

Posted 16 March 2015 - 11:31 AM

She's the MWO's catwalk model.

#88 LordBraxton

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,585 posts

Posted 16 March 2015 - 11:34 AM

Ill throw my hat in one last time.

It isnt about surface area or how competitive the mech will be.

The mech is too friggin tall, it looks stupid because of it, and I wish all mechs in MWO were much leaner in general.

The hopper might have less surface area, but it still looks fat to me.

Maybe this is my old eating disorder talking.

View PostHit the Deck, on 16 March 2015 - 11:31 AM, said:

She's the MWO's catwalk model.


nobody will believe me, but I dated a runway girl last fall, and they are DoA, trust me.

#89 Burktross

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • 3,663 posts
  • LocationStill in closed beta

Posted 16 March 2015 - 11:44 AM

View PostLordBraxton, on 16 March 2015 - 11:34 AM, said:

Ill throw my hat in one last time.

It isnt about surface area or how competitive the mech will be.

The mech is too friggin tall, it looks stupid because of it, and I wish all mechs in MWO were much leaner in general.

The hopper might have less surface area, but it still looks fat to me.

Maybe this is my old eating disorder talking.



nobody will believe me, but I dated a runway girl last fall, and they are DoA, trust me.

I understand and agree, but this is the objective part of the design, not the subjective.

#90 operatorZ

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Slayer
  • The Slayer
  • 556 posts

Posted 16 March 2015 - 11:54 AM

View PostLordBraxton, on 16 March 2015 - 11:34 AM, said:

Ill throw my hat in one last time.

It isnt about surface area or how competitive the mech will be.

The mech is too friggin tall, it looks stupid because of it, and I wish all mechs in MWO were much leaner in general.

The hopper might have less surface area, but it still looks fat to me.

Maybe this is my old eating disorder talking.



nobody will believe me, but I dated a runway girl last fall, and they are DoA, trust me.


I dated a run away girl in high school....she would always call me for money or "hanging out" as she called it...she once got me into a car chase when her mom found her and I sitting in her car and she drove off crazily...cops eventually got her to stop...like the grasshopper I expect in the right hands she could have been "OP" but in mine was most def "UP"...true story

#91 Burktross

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • 3,663 posts
  • LocationStill in closed beta

Posted 16 March 2015 - 12:24 PM

Major update!
Posted Image

Imgur is down, tell me if the image fails!
Adding to OP

#92 Burktross

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • 3,663 posts
  • LocationStill in closed beta

Posted 16 March 2015 - 12:38 PM

Fixed OP idiot error.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users