red devil2, on 17 March 2015 - 11:16 AM, said:
Umh.. my top score was 133 with a GAR-D: 704 dmg, 2 kills, 6 assists. So, basically, if you halve the damage and the stats, you get an acceptable match but far from being amazing.
That's why I said that 70 is not that much.
I had one loss at 101 points, 691 dmg, 1 kill 6 assists, 3 components destroyed and 3 spots. That's 83 points from old stats. That means 18 points are from actions from the new(er) scoring system (since I don't get the bonus 10 points... my games are all Skirmish PUG Solos).
Another win, I got 100 points, 526 dmg, 2 kills 8 assists, 2 components and 4 spots. That's 79 points from old stats and win, so 21 points are from actions.
IIRC Assault and Conquest you get bonus points for objectives.
The actions that net you points, you have to consistently work for them during the game, so it's not just say someone can just randomly pick up that many from just hanging around in the deathball. Straight line holders aren't likely to pick up those, it's those who flank, counter ECM, spots, that kind of things that will pile up the match score points. If someone did as you said, 350 damage, 1 kill 3 assists, and a win? He'll get 50 points base, a few more for actions, so probably around 60ish. Getting more than that generally means you have done more.
Looking at my EOM screens, at least half of any given winning team won't cross 70.