53 replies to this topic

[Mechteric]

Kristov Kerensky, on 17 March 2015 - 10:26 AM, said:

Hit Previous, upper left side....

Thanks, never noticed that small thing before!

I only played 11 matches, 10 of which were in Jenners. Average was 46 points.

Edited by CapperDeluxe, 17 March 2015 - 11:26 AM.

[process]

Light, 20 matches: 68.1. Firestarters and Huginn.
Medium, 2 matches: 91.5. Stormcrows.
Heavy, 3 matches: 84.3. Hellbringers.
Assault, 0 matches.

[DaZur]

Mediums = 71

Heavies = 68

Assaults = 38

Event average = 63

[mostnotweak]

Full games:

Light: 77.2
Medium: 92.9
Heavy: 85.6
Assault: 78.4

[DaZur]

cSand, on 17 March 2015 - 10:25 AM, said:

I dunno but all that money I made is about to be flushed down the Grasshopper-shaped toilet

My cash cache is about to be "Zeus'd"...

[C E Dwyer]

Light 55.66 in 6 games.
Mediums 81.36 in 11 games.
Heavies 59.42 in 7 games.
Assaults 63.05 in 20 games.

I posted on the assumption that you were just curious and it wasn't a Richard measuring contest. as a person who plays 20 heavy matches should do a lot, and I do mean a lot better in a Timberwolf than a person that did 20 matches in a Catapult.

Just as a person who plays purely clan in any catagory except lights should do a lot better than a person who plays exclusively Inner sphere

So without the break down of which mechs were used this is a completely in accurate and value less collection.

I mastered my resistance Panther and Enforcer, and then played a few matches in my Dragon slayer, before using the event to drag out old used mechs, one of my qualifying lights games was my Oxide, I used all my founder mech but the jener, I used all my assault hero's I used all my (P) mechs except the locust.

My highest matches were my Muromets 122 my yen lo wang, 123 and my Dragonslayer 108

Both the heavy and the Assault, are supposed has been mechs

Edited by Cathy, 17 March 2015 - 11:42 AM.

[DaZur]

Cathy, on 17 March 2015 - 11:38 AM, said:

My Wang was over 120...

Is that centimeters or millimeters?

Not that I need to know... I'm just a stickler for context.

[Lynx7725]

red devil2, on 17 March 2015 - 11:16 AM, said:

Umh.. my top score was 133 with a GAR-D: 704 dmg, 2 kills, 6 assists. So, basically, if you halve the damage and the stats, you get an acceptable match but far from being amazing.
That's why I said that 70 is not that much.

I had one loss at 101 points, 691 dmg, 1 kill 6 assists, 3 components destroyed and 3 spots. That's 83 points from old stats. That means 18 points are from actions from the new(er) scoring system (since I don't get the bonus 10 points... my games are all Skirmish PUG Solos).

Another win, I got 100 points, 526 dmg, 2 kills 8 assists, 2 components and 4 spots. That's 79 points from old stats and win, so 21 points are from actions.

IIRC Assault and Conquest you get bonus points for objectives.

The actions that net you points, you have to consistently work for them during the game, so it's not just say someone can just randomly pick up that many from just hanging around in the deathball. Straight line holders aren't likely to pick up those, it's those who flank, counter ECM, spots, that kind of things that will pile up the match score points. If someone did as you said, 350 damage, 1 kill 3 assists, and a win? He'll get 50 points base, a few more for actions, so probably around 60ish. Getting more than that generally means you have done more.

Looking at my EOM screens, at least half of any given winning team won't cross 70.

[Deathlike]

Lights (Jenner-D(S)): 60.25
Mediums (Stormcrow-Prime(I)): 75.5
Heavies (Hellbringer-Prime(I)): 64.05
Assaults (King Crab-000(L)): 56

It is what it is.

I was mostly uncomfortable with the Crab... and suffice it to say... it doesn't compare to a Dire Wolf by a longshot.

[One Medic Army]

red devil2, on 17 March 2015 - 11:16 AM, said:

Not on average but usually I do. It's quite simple with premium+hero mechs.


Umh.. my top score was 133 with a GAR-D: 704 dmg, 2 kills, 6 assists. So, basically, if you halve the damage and the stats, you get an acceptable match but far from being amazing.
That's why I said that 70 is not that much.

You did almost 100dmg to each target, and only killed 2 of them? It's quite easy to do less damage with more effect if you use pinpoint weapons. If I use SRMs/LRMs/LBX my score inflates quite a bit, but things don't die any faster.

[wanderer]

What's sad is a lot of my qualifier games were with teams so bad that they were things like 2-12 curbstomps.

My light average was 65.5... and I'd say half of those were games where most of the team didn't even get 30. At one point, I ended up not only with the high score, but outdamaged seven of the team combined. In a Kit Fox.

Heavies was 81.7 in my Orion.

Assaults was 67 in my King Crab.

Mediums were 53.5, but that was all of two matches in my Vindicator.

(Edit: Top scores were 98 KFX, 67 VND, 149 Orion, 148 KGC.)

Edited by wanderer, 17 March 2015 - 12:38 PM.

[Goose]

We have no access to the non-scoring games: Your Thread is Invalid

[ShadeofHades]

Huh, better than I expected:

Lights: 64.45 (1 KFX, 3 MLX, rest ADR)
Meds: 72 (13 NVA, 7 SCR)
Heavies: 67.83 (18 matches, 9 HBR, 1 TBR, 8 MDD)
Assaults: 61.8 (19 DWF, 1 WHK)

Average of 66.5, top scores were 129 in a Nova, and 111 in both a DWF and ADR.

Edited by ShadeofHades, 17 March 2015 - 01:54 PM.

[Roadkill]

The tournament didn't track non-qualifying matches, just FYI, so if you're just adding up the numbers reported at mwomercs.com/tournaments it's going to be high.

Mediums: 65/62
Heavies: 64
Assaults: 53/44

First number is just qualifiers. Second number includes non-qualifiers that I was tracking separately. I had 2 non-qualifiers in mediums, 0 in heavies, and 6 in assaults.

I spent the whole time in the solo queue where people have no idea how to make use of the assaults on their team, so getting the assaults done was painful.