Jump to content

Suggestion For Quirks


16 replies to this topic

#1 Knyx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Cadet
  • 266 posts

Posted 27 March 2015 - 05:35 AM

So with many of the clan perks they added having very little impact and kind of take away from the whole design of using adaptable omni-mech platforms I have some suggestions below that may make them more valuable. I would like to note that even though clan weapons, more specifically lasers, are better then their IS counterparts *on paper*, when applied to IS variants with applicable quirks they rise from being only slightly sub par (even though the math clearly shows better burst damage already for IS lasers) to superior then clan lasers by a large margin. When you take into account already superior ballistic weapons and then apply them to variants with applicable quirks... they are blatantly overpowered. All of this opposite of what these forums would have people believe.



Onto the suggestions...


Remove all current weapon based quirks from all clan mechs.
Give every clan mech intuitive adaptable quirks that depend on the weapon allocated in the hard point.

As an example of what I mean by this. Let's say you are building a laser vomit kind of Hellbringer, or rather a mix of C-LPL and ERMeds. Let's say you equip that C-LPL in a side torso, as soon as you do a quirk is added that, just as an example, reduces C-LPL duration and heat generation by 8%.

Another example, is lets say you equip that gauss rifle in the arm of that Dire Wolf. As soon as you put it in the slot a quirk is added reducing gauss rifle cooldown.

Etc etc.


I would also like to see any clan mech that does not have access too Endo and FF, be give the option to purchase and equip it, but just cause them to have heavier drawbacks then say if an IS counterpart purchases and equips the armor/structure upgrade.


Thanks for reading.

#2 Rhaythe

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 4,203 posts

Posted 27 March 2015 - 05:38 AM

I really can't see this idea doing much other than reducing time-to-kill even further. The quirks are meant to give underperforming mechs a boost while equipping specialized weapon systems. It's not meant to give across-the-board boosts. Modules do that.

#3 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 27 March 2015 - 05:40 AM

The problem with quirks that change to suit the weapon you mount is that there would be no reason to mount non-optimal weapons. Quirking less popular guns can give at least some modicum of motivation to use them... Why wouldn't I just slap LPL on everything? I already do even without quirks...

It also just reduces flavor in general, because every Clan mech would have the same quirks (especially due to the copy-and-paste ERML/LPL/Gauss/etc. Clan meta). Having pre-set quirks means that your mech has a clearly defined role to work around, rather than just being Gunbag A and Gunbag B.


The current system of quirks by Omnipod doesn't ruin the point of Omnis at all, because you can still mix-and-match your pods to create your ideal Mister Potatohead custom gundam build. So if you don't want the arm with ERPPC quirks, you can slide in the arm that has SRM buffs instead.


The real problems with the current Omni quirk system are as follows:

1. The values are weaksauce in many cases (lol 1% beam duration)
2. The specific choices for the type of quirks can be pretty derpy (ERPPC cooldown on a Puma? Whyyyyyyyyyy)

Edited by FupDup, 27 March 2015 - 05:42 AM.


#4 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 27 March 2015 - 05:51 AM

Here's an example of an attempt at Puma quirks that I made:

Spoiler


The main change I might make could be to move most of the leg quirks up to the CT to just make life easier (because I ran out of ideas for how to differentiate the legs). And of course tweak values here and there to not break the universe.

Edited by FupDup, 27 March 2015 - 05:53 AM.


#5 Knyx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Cadet
  • 266 posts

Posted 27 March 2015 - 05:53 AM

View PostFupDup, on 27 March 2015 - 05:40 AM, said:

The problem with quirks that change to suit the weapon you mount is that there would be no reason to mount non-optimal weapons. Quirking less popular guns can give at least some modicum of motivation to use them... Why wouldn't I just slap LPL on everything? I already do even without quirks...

It also just reduces flavor in general, because every Clan mech would have the same quirks (especially due to the copy-and-paste ERML/LPL/Gauss/etc. Clan meta). Having pre-set quirks means that your mech has a clearly defined role to work around, rather than just being Gunbag A and Gunbag B.


The current system of quirks by Omnipod doesn't ruin the point of Omnis at all, because you can still mix-and-match your pods to create your ideal Mister Potatohead custom gundam build. So if you don't want the arm with ERPPC quirks, you can slide in the arm that has SRM buffs instead.


The real problems with the current Omni quirk system are as follows:

1. The values are weaksauce in many cases (lol 1% beam duration)
2. The specific choices for the type of quirks can be pretty derpy (ERPPC cooldown on a Puma? Whyyyyyyyyyy)



If weapons are underperforming then why can't the weapons themselves get buffed. Quirks seem like a lazy and potential more dangerous way to balance.

I think with the adaptable quirks the actual % can be small, as long as the underpowered weapons get tuned themselves.
You could even take my idea further and say the lower the max tonnage of the mech the higher % in quirks the mech gets as well as more quirks total. However IS quirks on some of the top performers def need a substantial reduction

#6 Rhaythe

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 4,203 posts

Posted 27 March 2015 - 05:55 AM

View PostKnyx, on 27 March 2015 - 05:53 AM, said:

If weapons are underperforming then why can't the weapons themselves get buffed.


Because overperforming mechs using buffed weapons equals more bad. The medium laser is fine on its own. You don't want to buff it across the board for, say, the Locust when the Firestarter also uses them.

Edited by Rhaythe, 27 March 2015 - 05:55 AM.


#7 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 27 March 2015 - 05:57 AM

View PostKnyx, on 27 March 2015 - 05:53 AM, said:

If weapons are underperforming then why can't the weapons themselves get buffed. Quirks seem like a lazy and potential more dangerous way to balance.

I think with the adaptable quirks the actual % can be small, as long as the underpowered weapons get tuned themselves.
You could even take my idea further and say the lower the max tonnage of the mech the higher % in quirks the mech gets as well as more quirks total. However IS quirks on some of the top performers def need a substantial reduction

The issue is that in some cases, the lighter mech actually manages to be more effective as it is, so quirk strength based on just mech weight could cause problems real fast... And ultimately, even with weight considered, some mechs just don't need any. The Crow is lighter than a Thor, but the latter could use some quirk lovin' while the former should get basically nothing.

None of this addresses the issue of cookie-cutter loadouts getting buffed on every mech. Preset quirks set an actual role for each pod to fulfill and can make different mechs use different builds. If you don't like the role of a certain pod, then just play the Mister Potatohead game and swap it for a pod you do like.

Edited by FupDup, 27 March 2015 - 06:00 AM.


#8 sneeking

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 3,586 posts
  • Locationwest OZ

Posted 27 March 2015 - 05:58 AM

No quirks are not about under performing weapons but about mechs that need a leg up.

Weapon balance wont help weak mechs at all it will see them fall further due to other mechs using the same weapons and just been better.

The answer is mechs that can use the same weapon better ( quirks )

#9 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 27 March 2015 - 05:59 AM

View PostRhaythe, on 27 March 2015 - 05:55 AM, said:


Because overperforming mechs using buffed weapons equals more bad. The medium laser is fine on its own. You don't want to buff it across the board for, say, the Locust when the Firestarter also uses them.

I think that's not the best example because the IS ML* actually could maybe use a heat reduction to its original value as it is. It would help the weapon be more useful for people who want it as a backup gun (so it doesn't generate the same heat as their primary guns) and also just help the IS against the Clams in general.


*Also IS SL, because who uses them anyways?

#10 Rhaythe

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 4,203 posts

Posted 27 March 2015 - 06:06 AM

View PostFupDup, on 27 March 2015 - 05:59 AM, said:

I think that's not the best example because the IS ML* actually could maybe use a heat reduction to its original value as it is. It would help the weapon be more useful for people who want it as a backup gun (so it doesn't generate the same heat as their primary guns) and also just help the IS against the Clams in general.

And my Swayback will be grinning mightily if it happens. Rich getting richer and such.

View PostFupDup, on 27 March 2015 - 05:59 AM, said:

*Also IS SL, because who uses them anyways?

Yeah!!

*quietly hides his Locusts under a rock while no one's looking*

#11 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 27 March 2015 - 06:08 AM

View PostRhaythe, on 27 March 2015 - 06:06 AM, said:

And my Swayback will be grinning mightily if it happens. Rich getting richer and such.

Note that it would probably warrant another pass over IS ML heat quirks in general, as would any other weapon balance change...


View PostRhaythe, on 27 March 2015 - 06:06 AM, said:

Yeah!!

*quietly hides his Locusts under a rock while no one's looking*

You're the 0.1%. :P

#12 Rhaythe

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 4,203 posts

Posted 27 March 2015 - 06:11 AM

View PostFupDup, on 27 March 2015 - 06:08 AM, said:

You're the 0.1%. :P

Locust pilots - hell, according to the queue, Light pilots in general, for that matter...

#13 sneeking

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 3,586 posts
  • Locationwest OZ

Posted 27 March 2015 - 06:12 AM

Im not saying they have it right just now but It's my feeling that quirking is the right way to go.

For diversity and fun not for realism and what would crush who in reality.

#14 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 27 March 2015 - 06:12 AM

View PostRhaythe, on 27 March 2015 - 06:11 AM, said:

Locust pilots - hell, according to the queue, Light pilots in general, for that matter...

I was referring to users of the IS Small Laser, actually.

Small Laser using lights are a minority within the minority...

#15 Rhaythe

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 4,203 posts

Posted 27 March 2015 - 06:15 AM

View PostFupDup, on 27 March 2015 - 06:12 AM, said:

I was referring to users of the IS Small Laser, actually.

Small Laser using lights are a minority within the minority...

I don't care about Kill-to-Death ratio. Can you tell?

Back on topic - quirks aren't ideal, but they DO add a new layer of customization strategy to the game, so I've learned to like them. Do have to be careful with them when buffing weapons, however. Otherwise, the crying that happened during the 3ERPPC Thundernewb Crisis comes back.

#16 sneeking

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 3,586 posts
  • Locationwest OZ

Posted 27 March 2015 - 06:23 AM

I like the idea of quirks and I even like some of the existing quirks.

There is a lot of room for the idea to evolve.



#17 Knyx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Cadet
  • 266 posts

Posted 27 March 2015 - 06:47 AM

But you have to agree there are also mechs where quirks won't help without having to make them outrageous. Like the Ferret or Gargoyle for example. Using those 2 examples getting more *available* tonnage would go along way. What I mean by available is, say if you stripped the Ferret/Garg of all equipment but used all armor points, that free tonnage you have to use for weapons/equipment is far too small and increasing it even by 3-8 tons would go a long way. By increasing it I also don't mean increasing the max tonnage, I mean keeping the max tonnage the way it is but decreasing the minimum tonnage after stripped.

Also it's not just clans, in regular que I see probably 80% of the mechs in every match are IS (prob cuz of cost). But in CW 75% of the IS mechs I see are either Stalker, Tbolts, Ravens or Firestarters. Many of these are due to hugely over tuned quirks. Which is exactly the cookie cutter builds, as you say, should be frowned on.

Edited by Knyx, 27 March 2015 - 06:58 AM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users