Jump to content

Add "dropdeck Overweight" Message To Cw


5 replies to this topic

#1 Chiron

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Moderate Giver
  • Moderate Giver
  • 123 posts
  • LocationCharlottesville, VA

Posted 28 March 2015 - 04:30 AM

TLDR: Add the error message "Dropdeck is overweight" to CW selection.


In all honesty, this is my own fault, coming from a clan defense CW match to an IS attack. That being said, making this game more clear and easy to understand is always a good thing. All the attack/defend boxes were blacked out! I spent an hour trying to find why i could not join any more CW matches, and when I re-logged and clicked defend, it'd give an error message "Failed to find match"

#2 MechWarrior849305

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,024 posts

Posted 31 March 2015 - 12:46 AM

View PostChiron, on 28 March 2015 - 04:30 AM, said:

TLDR: Add the error message "Dropdeck is overweight" to CW selection.


In all honesty, this is my own fault, coming from a clan defense CW match to an IS attack. That being said, making this game more clear and easy to understand is always a good thing. All the attack/defend boxes were blacked out! I spent an hour trying to find why i could not join any more CW matches, and when I re-logged and clicked defend, it'd give an error message "Failed to find match"

Although it was mentioned b4 somewhere in a past sugs and so,.. but I think PGI are going to even weight of dropdeck for IS, no matter if it is against Clans or Sphere (at least PGI mentioned that). So wait till next patch.

#3 David Sumner

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 470 posts
  • LocationAuckland, New Zealand

Posted 31 March 2015 - 02:29 AM

View PostDuoAngel, on 31 March 2015 - 12:46 AM, said:


Although it was mentioned b4 somewhere in a past sugs and so,.. but I think PGI are going to even weight of dropdeck for IS, no matter if it is against Clans or Sphere (at least PGI mentioned that). So wait till next patch.


You misunderstand, his deck was too heavy for the dropship allowance but he didn't get a warning message

#4 MechWarrior849305

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,024 posts

Posted 31 March 2015 - 05:11 AM

View PostDavid Sumner, on 31 March 2015 - 02:29 AM, said:

You misunderstand, his deck was too heavy for the dropship allowance but he didn't get a warning message

He said , that he had changed clan frontline for IS frontline. If we had evened weights for clan and IS decks - there were no need in any change of mech set. So I understood him rite

#5 David Sumner

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 470 posts
  • LocationAuckland, New Zealand

Posted 01 April 2015 - 12:38 AM

View PostDuoAngel, on 31 March 2015 - 05:11 AM, said:


He said , that he had changed clan frontline for IS frontline. If we had evened weights for clan and IS decks - there were no need in any change of mech set. So I understood him rite


Except you're implying that he somehow is allowed to use clan mechs for an IS mission or vice versa.
Which I thought was not permitted?


#6 MechWarrior849305

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,024 posts

Posted 01 April 2015 - 05:10 AM

View PostDavid Sumner, on 01 April 2015 - 12:38 AM, said:

Except you're implying that he somehow is allowed to use clan mechs for an IS mission or vice versa.
Which I thought was not permitted?

facepalm.jpg.
READ first, THINK about what was written.
And only after reply. GG, close -_-

Edited by DuoAngel, 01 April 2015 - 05:10 AM.






2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users