41 replies to this topic

[Night Thastus]

Question is in the title.
When is the Dragon getting it's geometry pass?
(Aka when the loadout effects the visual appearance of the 'mech)

Anyone know?

[Tarogato]

After what they did to the Jager, I don't want to see any more mechs getting any geometry passes.

[Burktross]

ive posted my comic enough times
The answer:
too soon

[Mechammer555]

You mean when will Dragon get its little bitty guns and shiny purple metal all over. Hopefully NEVER!

[Lyoto Machida]

Hopefully never?

PGI has already ruined most of the good looking older mechs.

[Armorine]

Nope nope and nope

[Tennex]

please no

[Gigastrike]

I hope they never do a single thing to risk ruining that shoulder cannon placement.

Edited by Gigastrike, 03 April 2015 - 06:00 PM.

[Nothing Whatsoever]

If it makes the arm hit boxes smaller it should help keep them dakka dakka going a bit long if you still have ammo.

I'm curious to see how the torso missiles are gonna be handled, and it'll be neat to see the Flame Ballistic change and see PPCs to better emulate a Grand Dragon.

[RoboPatton]

If it means a more slender torso and pulling its arms in (smaller profile), I'd be fine. But if all it is, is tiny pop guns, no thanks.

[Juodas Varnas]

[Virgil Greyson]

No geometry passes please!

[Myke Pantera]

Since, as you can see in this topic, the community *#@££*@%#&£% every time they do a geometry pass on a mech, they might just leave the rest untouched.

I personally am in favour of these passes with the only exceptions being Jagers and Missilepults. Cataphracts are fine, as are PPCpults. Very few ppl complain about small weapons on newer released mechs or clan mechs so how bad can it possibly be?

[Anarcho]

I just bought 3 dragons... and , yeah, it looks cool with big guns, but the dynamic geometry is here to stay :/

See the bright side, it helps to identify enemy weapons a little bit faster than the paperdoll...

[Quxudica]

Tarogato, on 03 April 2015 - 05:14 PM, said:

After what they did to the Jager, I don't want to see any more mechs getting any geometry passes.

At least the Jaeger change was a minor buff instead of a nerf like the catapult's vcr's.

[A Large Infant]

Virgil Greyson, on 03 April 2015 - 10:34 PM, said:

No geometry passes please!

you stole my gif!!!!!!!!!

[zagibu]

The 3 ballistics in the 5N's arm imply another power plug design like on the CN9. Definitely NOT looking forward to this.

[Virgil Greyson]

Meeso Thorny, on 04 April 2015 - 12:35 AM, said:

you stole my gif!!!!!!!!!

Sorry. I liked it so much.

[Satan n stuff]

Anarcho, on 03 April 2015 - 11:06 PM, said:

I just bought 3 dragons... and , yeah, it looks cool with big guns, but the dynamic geometry is here to stay :/

See the bright side, it helps to identify enemy weapons a little bit faster than the paperdoll...

If you're close enough to get a good look at the weapons you'd already have them on the paperdoll.

[LordKnightFandragon]

Oh, you mean when is the Dragon getting all it's guns shrunk? PGI needs to stop that and now......tune in next week when a 155mm Long tom is the size of a pop gun cuz...dynamic geometry...