Star Wars vs Star Trek vs Battle Tech Space Battles
#1101
Posted 29 September 2012 - 09:56 PM
#1102
Posted 29 September 2012 - 10:08 PM
#1103
Posted 29 September 2012 - 11:10 PM
Here's one, probably one of the most powerful of the "hard sci-fi" ships. Compare to... whatever. Halo would probably be the closest match.
Omega Destroyer:
Size - 1710m
Acceleration - 60m/s*s
Manuevring - 30 deg/sec
FTL - Hyperspace (speed of plot)
Engagement Range - 800km
Hull - 8m (20x iron strength/heat capacity)
Firing Arc - 360 degrees (half of its weaponry being available at a time)
Weapons -
6x X-Ray Lasers (860kt/sec)
6x Pulse Cannons (200kt/bolt)
2x Missile Launchers (2mt/missile)
12x Point Defense Pulse Guns (1kt/bolt)
Funfact - has a spinny section, huge advantage
Babylon 5 has some of the most consistent visuals in terms of weapon powers, and definetly needs to included more on this forum. Here's a Shadow vessel, if you want to throw that at some of the higher-level options. Enjoy.
Shadow Battlecrab:
Size - 3000m (width)
Acceleration - 60km/s*s
Manuevring - 180 deg/sec
FTL - Hyperspace (speed of plot)
Engagement Range - uh... let's say... a light second
Engagement Range - 600km/s*s
Hull - 1gt threshold
Firing Arc - 120 degrees
Weapons - Particle Ray (300mt/sec)
Funfact - can phase in and out of realspace at will, whenever, with perfect accuracy
Manuevring? Manouvring? Manuveraring? Manuvering? How the hell do you spell it?
Edited by Zakatak, 29 September 2012 - 11:18 PM.
#1104
Posted 29 September 2012 - 11:49 PM
But then again, they've never met Frank Horrigan either.
Frank Horrigan punches Enclave soldiers in half. Frank Horrigan punches Deathclaws so hard they EXPLODE. Frank Horrigan versus Space Marine. Go.
Edited by Zakatak, 29 September 2012 - 11:54 PM.
#1105
Posted 30 September 2012 - 12:20 AM
That Warhammer 40k universe is awesome.
#1106
Posted 30 September 2012 - 03:29 AM
Splicerb, on 29 September 2012 - 10:08 PM, said:
The first one was destroyed by a boy and a single proton torpedo. The second was destroyed with help from a race of sentient teddy bears. When it comes to all-powerful weapons of destruction, I'd say the Death Star(s) are lower on the list...
Edited by pursang, 30 September 2012 - 03:29 AM.
#1107
Posted 30 September 2012 - 04:27 AM
The obvious solution is obvious.
Pick the universe you personally like the most? Then kill off all the other writing teams.
End of argument.
#1108
Posted 30 September 2012 - 05:21 AM
Emrys Ap Morgravaine, on 30 September 2012 - 04:27 AM, said:
The obvious solution is obvious.
Pick the universe you personally like the most? Then kill off all the other writing teams.
End of argument.
Eh, that can have unforeseen consequences. Take it from a Trek fan, you don't want Orci and Kurtzman coming in and becoming your writing team
#1110
Posted 01 October 2012 - 11:32 PM
#1111
Posted 12 May 2013 - 04:05 PM
Edited by Strum Wealh, 12 May 2013 - 04:05 PM.
#1112
Posted 12 May 2013 - 05:07 PM
Who knows how the film might differ from the books, though.
If that was the case, then we're talking about a civilization with literally infinitely powerful weapons. Any sized version of it should be able to destroy anything not protected by some countering technology (energy shielding, etc). Am I remembering incorrectly? (sophomore English in high school wasn't exactly yesterday )
#1113
Posted 13 May 2013 - 02:09 PM
#1114
Posted 13 May 2013 - 06:57 PM
GonZo626, on 13 May 2013 - 02:09 PM, said:
Catamount, on 12 May 2013 - 05:07 PM, said:
Who knows how the film might differ from the books, though.
If that was the case, then we're talking about a civilization with literally infinitely powerful weapons. Any sized version of it should be able to destroy anything not protected by some countering technology (energy shielding, etc). Am I remembering incorrectly? (sophomore English in high school wasn't exactly yesterday )
#1115
Posted 13 May 2013 - 09:05 PM
#1116
Posted 13 May 2013 - 11:27 PM
no firefly...how can i vote on an incomplete ballot
but doesn't matter...
#1117
Posted 14 May 2013 - 06:41 AM
#1118
Posted 14 May 2013 - 11:03 AM
GonZo626, on 13 May 2013 - 02:09 PM, said:
The capability to destroy a star or use a star destructively without destroying it is trivial in Star Trek and a few other franchises, but of course, most of the levels of destruction we see in Wars, in and out of EU, are trivial.
And Star Trek's capabilities are trivial compared to what the Ancients in Stargate, and their rival races (two of which are extant), are capable of.
Wars isn't even close to the top of the heap even with EU (and without, it falls even further).
Strum Wealh, on 13 May 2013 - 06:57 PM, said:
From what I've been able to find, the "Doctor Device" seems to be a beam weapon with a relatively limited range (for the purposes of spaceborne warfare); its use against the Formic homeworld would seem to indicate that it is at least (and possibly at most) capable of orbital bombardment. From the description (particularly with how it takes three millennia to miniaturize it to the point of being able to fit into a missile), it sounds like the MD Device follows the "Wave Motion Gun" trope (that is, being a "singular main gun" type of weapon). Do we know anything about the IF's (presumably) more-common ship-to-ship weapons and defenses, or even the size and composition of the IF (e.g. how many of them are actually combat vessels, as opposed to supply ships and such)?
The implication is that their ships are few, slow, and not much beyond our own technology in most respects, but beyond that I couldn't give specifics.
They'd quickly be overwhelmed by any real star-faring power, but still, they could inflict real damage with a weapon like that.
Edited by Catamount, 14 May 2013 - 11:08 AM.
#1120
Posted 15 May 2013 - 08:06 PM
IMO really really goof BSG verse vs Star trek
Its a little long in certain areas but other than that I liked it
Edited by Mechwarrior Buddah, 15 May 2013 - 08:20 PM.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users