

Large Laser Warfare
#1
Posted 08 May 2015 - 05:39 PM
#2
Posted 08 May 2015 - 05:40 PM
#3
Posted 08 May 2015 - 05:45 PM
#4
Posted 08 May 2015 - 09:07 PM
#5
Posted 08 May 2015 - 09:14 PM
we need a better balanced meta where long-range and brawling both have a place.
#6
Posted 08 May 2015 - 09:21 PM
Khobai, on 08 May 2015 - 09:14 PM, said:
we need a better balanced meta where long-range and brawling both have a place.
You are thinking to one map. The game is already mostly done in brawl range. In my opinion one of the problems are ammunitions, this is why you see a lot of energy fight in CW but not in short games.
I have excellent IS/Clan ammo-based mechs but I would never use any of those in CW except, maybe, some dedicated LRM boats with 10tons+ of ammo.
CW maps could use reload bays for defenders, deployed ammo crates for attackers. I also would like to see minor repairs, for example recover to up 33% of armor in each location but without recovering lost limbs/weapons/equipment nor internal structure. There should be an advantage in being able to save a mech from an attack/defend wave.
Edited by EvilCow, 08 May 2015 - 09:25 PM.
#7
Posted 08 May 2015 - 09:23 PM
#8
Posted 08 May 2015 - 09:39 PM
Quote
no the game is not mostly done in brawl range. wtf are you even talking about.
brawl range is like 270m or less. most of the fighting takes place at 500m-1000m. thats not brawl range at all.
if we had more fighting at 270m or less, BAP/NARC would counter ECM a lot more, target locks would get held more frequently, and LRMs would have an actual purpose as a brawler support weapon.
Quote
ammunition has nothing to do with it. gauss uses ammo and you still see gauss all the time in CW.
lasers/gauss/thunderbolt erppcs = decent range and instant or very fast travel time which makes them easy to hit with at long range.
lasers = use most commonly available hardpoint, have very low tonnage/crit requirements, and thus are very easy to boat. lasers also get better quirks in general than other weapons (i.e. stalker 4N/targeting computer)
again the problem is the long ranges and the near instant or very fast projectile speeds which makes hitting at long range very easy.
The range of clan lasers, ERPPC, Gauss, and stalker quirks all need to be reduced. IS SRMs/Streaks and Clan ACs need to be buffed. By encouraging more close-in fighting you also make LRMs a more reliable weapon. Everything gets brought back into parity.
Edited by Khobai, 08 May 2015 - 09:57 PM.
#9
Posted 08 May 2015 - 10:13 PM
#10
Posted 08 May 2015 - 10:20 PM
Khobai, on 08 May 2015 - 09:14 PM, said:
we need a better balanced meta where long-range and brawling both have a place.
Give us 1x ranges and 40-50 point heat scales. The long range wont always be cool enough to fire and once the brawlers get in close, its a **** fest...better hope your own brawlers are near by or you get out DPS'd badly with all that slow firing and hot LL/ERPPC/Gauss...stuff...
#11
Posted 08 May 2015 - 10:22 PM
Quote
I did not know that there was a brawl range
my beam wolf spends most of its like in the nerf corner so its CERLL don't do much
#12
Posted 08 May 2015 - 10:29 PM
LordKnightFandragon, on 08 May 2015 - 10:20 PM, said:
Give us 1x ranges and 40-50 point heat scales. The long range wont always be cool enough to fire and once the brawlers get in close, its a **** fest...better hope your own brawlers are near by or you get out DPS'd badly with all that slow firing and hot LL/ERPPC/Gauss...stuff...
Don't even need to do that. Just debuff all the garbage laser ****. Knock the C-LPL, C-ERLL, and IS LPL back to down to 10 damage, knock the IS LL and IS LPL back up to eight heat, and knock the IS ML and IS SL back to stock values remove all heat gen quirks and suddenly something besides laser puke is competitive.
#13
Posted 08 May 2015 - 10:43 PM
Lord Scarlett Johan, on 08 May 2015 - 10:29 PM, said:
IKR? Give a weapon that has hit scan, unlimited ammo, fast cool downs, kinda light and deal more dmg then heat....why take anything else?
It'd be like giving the Machinegun class in any FPS game sniper accuracy with the recoil of a air gun, the ammo capacity of a machinegun and the damage of a Assault rifle.....nothing else is used. lol.
#14
Posted 08 May 2015 - 10:45 PM
Buff IS-SRMs to 2.5 damage and Clan SRMs to 2.2 per missile and reduce spread by 20%.
#15
Posted 08 May 2015 - 10:46 PM
LordKnightFandragon, on 08 May 2015 - 10:43 PM, said:
IKR? Give a weapon that has hit scan, unlimited ammo, fast cool downs, kinda light and deal more dmg then heat....why take anything else?
It'd be like giving the Machinegun class in any FPS game sniper accuracy with the recoil of a air gun, the ammo capacity of a machinegun and the damage of a Assault rifle.....nothing else is used. lol.
Pretty much. All the large class lasers have more than TT damage values and less than TT heat values. Then the small and medium class beam lasers all have more than TT heat values.
#16
Posted 08 May 2015 - 10:47 PM
EvilCow, on 08 May 2015 - 09:21 PM, said:
You are thinking to one map. The game is already mostly done in brawl range. In my opinion one of the problems are ammunitions, this is why you see a lot of energy fight in CW but not in short games.
I have excellent IS/Clan ammo-based mechs but I would never use any of those in CW except, maybe, some dedicated LRM boats with 10tons+ of ammo.
CW maps could use reload bays for defenders, deployed ammo crates for attackers. I also would like to see minor repairs, for example recover to up 33% of armor in each location but without recovering lost limbs/weapons/equipment nor internal structure. There should be an advantage in being able to save a mech from an attack/defend wave.
#18
Posted 08 May 2015 - 11:13 PM
Grisbane, on 08 May 2015 - 11:10 PM, said:
I am guessing you are mostly in pug drops in CW.. the only time i see medium range fighting is when we are killing pug groups faster than they can replenish. against a good organized unit the tactics depend on map.. 1 or 2 maps are snipe-fests in opening stages.. otherwise it is almost always an in-your-face furball... and in those furballs.. almost no-one brings lrms (except a certain Ghost Bear unit .. *cough.. CGBI.. Cough*)
LOL, I dropped with a pug group of IS on defense against a CGBI mixed unit and the CGBI guys lost........it was actually kinda sad to see...I was expecting a ready, set, game over, total ass whooping, but in the end, us on the IS side won.
#19
Posted 08 May 2015 - 11:28 PM
#20
Posted 09 May 2015 - 12:21 AM
Every military unit seeks to find the longest effective range for its weapon system. Shorter ranges are only chosen as a compromise due to some limiting factor.
Every mech should seek to mount as many Large-type lasers as their tonnage and cooling will allow...unless they can dictate range and then choose mediums, especially if they can mount more mediums than they could large, up to the limits of their desired cooling.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users