Is Dropdeck Tonnage Reduction Now In Effect
#32
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:08 PM
Clanners won Tukayyid. Clanners won the majority of matches in Tukayyid (not just getting the % flipped in their favor at the final stretch). Clan units had overall better win %'s on average. We're hitting the IS drop decks now, why? I'd prefer some sort of explanation from PGI on the logic, please.
#33
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:08 PM
#34
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:12 PM
Kay Wolf, on 11 May 2015 - 02:47 PM, said:
#35
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:13 PM
#36
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:13 PM
This looks like test. Just put forward in a story.
See what players then adjust their drop decks to.
See how that affects the games.
I like the mention of logistics and supply lines here and it has just occurred to me that the altering of the drop deck tonnage is a fairly simple way to create the effect of logistics.
#37
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:14 PM
- no real reason to not be a mercanary group like MS and others that go to what ever faction gives them quickest game times or highest pay outs. Clan wars is a group game and the biggest groups are IS right now not Clan. give it time and they will go back to Clan and then we will be in the same boat.
- No real reason to keep a planet. Unit X captures planet and gets its name on it................. whoppp eeee no one cares. if it generates MC every so often or can be upgraded outfitted how Unit X likes or really anything to give owning and controlling a planet meaning and substances it will help having the large influx of units going back and fortieth
#38
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:15 PM
#39
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:15 PM
#40
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:15 PM
Sound ******* insane? So does nerfing IS drop decks after the IS just lost a major CW event.
If you really want to shake things up, nerf IS drop deck to 240 and Clan drop deck to 230
#41
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:16 PM
#42
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:18 PM
3x Thud, 1x FS9 = 230 tons. Meta deck UNCHANGED
2x Stalker, 2x FS9 = 240 Tons. Meta deck UNCHANGED
If any of you think this 10 ton change means anything, it really doesn't. Just like how the initial 10 ton increase did jack squat. Feel free to make a mountain out of a molehill non issue, however.
I will see myself out now. Enjoy.
Edited by Pariah Devalis, 11 May 2015 - 03:20 PM.
#43
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:21 PM
Pariah Devalis, on 11 May 2015 - 03:18 PM, said:
3x Thud, 1x FS9 = 230 tons. Meta deck UNCHANGED
2x Stalker, 2x FS9 = 240 Tons. Meta deck UNCHANGED
If any of you think this 10 ton change means anything, it really doesn't. Just like how the initial 10 ton increase did jack squat. Feel free to make a mountain out of a molehill non issue, however.
I will see myself out now. Enjoy.
Yeah it doesn't change anything except reduce drop deck flexibility, which reduces fun. I have to downgrade a Highlander to a Stalker-4N now
Literally would have preferred they just up Clan tonnage to 250.
#45
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:23 PM
#46
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:24 PM
#47
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:24 PM
50 50, on 11 May 2015 - 03:13 PM, said:
This looks like test. Just put forward in a story.
See what players then adjust their drop decks to.
See how that affects the games.
I like the mention of logistics and supply lines here and it has just occurred to me that the altering of the drop deck tonnage is a fairly simple way to create the effect of logistics.
Yes, its all so realistic... like the fact we can't actually defeat a Clan in CW and kick it out of the innersphere... or that the maps are the same no matter which planet you drop on... and the maps sometimes represent radically different planets/eco system...
And no matter which planet you capture it has no strategic value beyond getting you one stop closer to Terra. So yes, supply lines and logistical issues causing drop deck limits to go down makes perfect sense in this virtual universe.
Edited by Jman88, 11 May 2015 - 10:00 PM.
#48
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:25 PM
Gas Guzzler, on 11 May 2015 - 03:21 PM, said:
Yeah it doesn't change anything except reduce drop deck flexibility, which reduces fun. I have to downgrade a Highlander to a Stalker-4N now
Literally would have preferred they just up Clan tonnage to 250.
Could always change other parts of the drop deck aside from the top end. Or make due with a filler mech like the clans have with the damned MLX - though that was not fair to our decks nor would it be to yours. Though, having said that, your options are a bit better what with an ECM capable commando or locust which still brings speed to the fight. It's something? I donno.
Personally, I dislike the drop deck being tonnage limited period. Would much prefer a 1/1/1/1 system of some sort, though I realize I am in the minority in that opinion.
Edited by Pariah Devalis, 11 May 2015 - 03:26 PM.
#49
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:27 PM
Gas Guzzler, on 11 May 2015 - 03:21 PM, said:
Yeah it doesn't change anything except reduce drop deck flexibility, which reduces fun. I have to downgrade a Highlander to a Stalker-4N now
Literally would have preferred they just up Clan tonnage to 250.
Going from a highlander to a stalker in CW is an upgrade, FYI. Quirks man, quirks. Quirks are the real issue here.
#50
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:27 PM
... meeting the Second Clan Invasion with greater strength and ferocity than ever....
... such gains come at a cost...
....already being stressed by extended Clan occupation...
....even greater turmoil in the wake of immense losses experienced at the Battle of Tukayyid....
....Inner Sphere forces have stretched their supply lines too thin....
All above epic bullcrap story gives 4% tonnage reduction?? 4%????
FFS PGI if you want to "ballance" (lol?) something please kindly don't bother to waste time on bleach storytelling.
At least now I know - the victory was worth exactly 10 tonnes!!!!!!!!
EDIT: sorry, I forgot to say - thats totally pathetic!
Edited by DarkExar, 11 May 2015 - 03:30 PM.
#51
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:27 PM
Good bye even more CW. See you in the next century.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users




























