Jump to content

Visible Proven Leadership

Started by Fluff My Garfield, May 15 2015 04:55 AM

20 replies to this topic

Poll: POLL BROKEN. I didn't know all questions had to be answered to submit so didn't have all options needed from day 1. (14 member(s) have cast votes)

Is this a good idea?

  1. Yep (8 votes [57.14%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 57.14%

  2. Nope (6 votes [42.86%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 42.86%

IF you think it is BAD, why?

  1. Too complicated to implement (2 votes [14.29%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  2. Too exploitable (4 votes [28.57%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 28.57%

  3. Just plain stupid (2 votes [14.29%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  4. PUGs can't handle this (2 votes [14.29%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  5. I like it just fine. (4 votes [28.57%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 28.57%

IF you think it is GOOD, why?

  1. Seems like it might be an improvement (9 votes [64.29%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 64.29%

  2. Fixes an exact problem I noticed (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. I'm going to enjoy exploiting it (2 votes [14.29%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  4. I don't like it at all. (3 votes [21.43%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 21.43%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 Vahgus

    Member

  • PipPip
  • 46 posts
  • LocationThe other end of that ER PPC that just hit you.

Posted 18 August 2016 - 05:35 PM

Admittedly I skimmed over the comments. I think this system would be a good idea if the voting option for improving rep only showed up after a victorious match. Also maybe it complicates the whole idea, but what about being able to vote down a rep after a loss?

Also I noticed that most players can't tell the difference between announcing an enemy contact and calling a target, but that may simply be, because there is no standard for doing so. Why would you announce a enemy contact? So the group knows they are there and can take care of them when able.
Back to Feature Suggestions · Next Unread Topic →


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users