Gonna admit: only read half the total thread at this point. Mostly because a lot of it started being Bishop snarfing off at people, which is normally at least comical but in this case I had an actual semi-legit comment to throw out there.
Having read at least twenty "read the OP" responses from the Bish so far, I get that the man is not referring to the people who actually try to make the 'Mech work. The point, I suppose, is that you can't use a thread title like "Is There Anything that Takes Less Skill to Run than an ER Large Laser Raven-3L?" and then not expect people who actually like the 'Mech/playstyle to not emerge to defend their choice. If the thread had been entitled "Is There Anything Worse Than No-Talent Hacks In 1k 'Sniper' 'Mechs?", and then used the 3L build as an example of such, that would have been an entirely different thread. Probably a shorter one with a lot less snarling.
Heh, but Bishop does so enjoy his sensationalist thread titles, eh?
Anyways.
If I were to run my 3L again - and admittedly, this thread kinna makes me want to do just that - I would run it as a DuaLarge machine because Ravens are
awful in close quarters, Huginn and its stupidiculous SRM quirks notwithstanding. They're just about the easiest 'Mechs in the game to leg, and since most Ravens require a mix of SRMs and lasers to do close-range builds due to hardpoint restrictions they don't get to go full ham on their quirkset the way Firestarters (or Hugginz) do. They just don't contribute as effectively in a close-quarters skirmisher role as they can in a medium to long-range role. Not if your objective is to still have feet by the end of the match.
It's sad because lore-wise Ravens are among my favorite 'Mechs in the 'verse, and I used to enjoy my Ravens a great deal. These days though, the things may as well have Blast Panels for legs. When, when, WHEN is PGI going to revisit the poor Ravens' hitboxes?
Lahdee, so much old nerf to undo...so little chance of it ever happening...