

Mwo With Ps/xbox Controller
#21
Posted 15 July 2015 - 08:47 PM
#22
Posted 15 July 2015 - 09:02 PM
It DOES take getting used to (if you choose joystick) don't expect to win the first several matches, until you've adjusted.
However, the immersion is so much greater, I personally would not go back to mouse and KB, even given the loss in aiming fidelity and speed.
#23
Posted 15 July 2015 - 09:48 PM
#24
Posted 15 July 2015 - 10:15 PM
That said I do use stick & fligh pedals myself: stick for throttle and targeting buttons, pedals for turning legs and JJs(toe brakes). Mouse is hard to beat when it comes to aiming.
Edited by Erkki, 15 July 2015 - 10:17 PM.
#25
Posted 15 July 2015 - 10:28 PM
If you want to try something different I suggest a joystick... I hear they're a lot of fun and more immersive.
EDIT: Also, if Yokilin uses a joystick I can also attest it doesn't affect him. He's a beast in that Oxide.
Edited by Team Chevy86, 15 July 2015 - 10:31 PM.
#26
Posted 15 July 2015 - 11:14 PM
Kodyn, on 15 July 2015 - 08:47 PM, said:
i mostly stopped using sticks because the one i got is 8 years old and has become rather imprecise. i cant afford to replace it, so im mousing for now. its improved my game but i miss the immersion that stick provided.
#27
Posted 15 July 2015 - 11:23 PM
Erkki, on 15 July 2015 - 10:15 PM, said:
That said I do use stick & fligh pedals myself: stick for throttle and targeting buttons, pedals for turning legs and JJs(toe brakes). Mouse is hard to beat when it comes to aiming.
Some of us have no problems with moving targets, thank you. At 600m+, not as accurately, but again, not all playstyles demand long-range sniping. Plus, most of us will never achieve the lofty elite status of the professional MWO gamer, so it does not make much difference.
At the end of the day, if one enjoys using it, then it is perfectly fine to use whatever input device you like. It IS after all, simply a game, played for fun (and everyone's definition of fun is a bit different).
#28
Posted 15 July 2015 - 11:24 PM


Edited by 627, 15 July 2015 - 11:26 PM.
#31
Posted 16 July 2015 - 12:03 AM
#32
Posted 16 July 2015 - 12:34 AM
That, or you get a headtracking device that points your reticule where you're looking...good luck with that though lol
Edited by Telmasa, 16 July 2015 - 12:35 AM.
#33
Posted 16 July 2015 - 12:54 AM
#34
Posted 16 July 2015 - 12:59 AM
But if some specific controller is fun to you, don't let anyone tell you otherwise. You might not be competitive, but I wager that 90+% of us don't give a toss about that anyway.
LordNothing, on 15 July 2015 - 06:49 PM, said:
Gives a whole new meaning to balls-out brawling. But for the love of god, do NOT post a video.
#35
Posted 16 July 2015 - 01:02 AM
Hit the Deck, on 16 July 2015 - 12:54 AM, said:
If fine tuning your throttle was enough of a gain to justify not using a mouse to aim then I'm all for it, but I don't think a little throttle precision is going to make up for the lack of a mouse.
#37
Posted 16 July 2015 - 01:20 AM
Xetelian, on 16 July 2015 - 01:02 AM, said:
If fine tuning your throttle was enough of a gain to justify not using a mouse to aim then I'm all for it, but I don't think a little throttle precision is going to make up for the lack of a mouse.
Well, I'm just talking about analog controls in general. You can actually still use a mouse for aiming and a pad/stick for moving.
#38
Posted 16 July 2015 - 01:32 AM
Praehotec8, on 15 July 2015 - 11:23 PM, said:
Some of us have no problems with moving targets, thank you. At 600m+, not as accurately, but again, not all playstyles demand long-range sniping. Plus, most of us will never achieve the lofty elite status of the professional MWO gamer, so it does not make much difference.
At the end of the day, if one enjoys using it, then it is perfectly fine to use whatever input device you like. It IS after all, simply a game, played for fun (and everyone's definition of fun is a bit different).
Sure, if one enjoys immersion, missing shots, losing matches and is not bothered by being mostly a hindrance to ones own team unless playing a LRM/SRM/Streak boat then by all means use a game pad/stick for aiming.
For some of us good part of the enjoyment comes from things other than graphics/sounds/other kinds of immersion: learning new stuff and doing ones best(within limits of course, as in not being too serious about it) and working together in trying to win matches in a team game. I guess it could be called good sportsmanship.
Edited by Erkki, 16 July 2015 - 01:33 AM.
#39
Posted 16 July 2015 - 01:36 AM
Xetelian, on 16 July 2015 - 01:02 AM, said:
If fine tuning your throttle was enough of a gain to justify not using a mouse to aim then I'm all for it, but I don't think a little throttle precision is going to make up for the lack of a mouse.
Yes, for you. But for someone else, they may prefer the more realistic feel of a joystick.
More joy from a joystick... I didn't plan that!

Erkki, on 16 July 2015 - 01:32 AM, said:
Sure, if one enjoys immersion, missing shots, losing matches and is not bothered by being mostly a hindrance to ones own team unless playing a LRM/SRM/Streak boat then by all means use a game pad/stick for aiming.
For some of us good part of the enjoyment comes from things other than graphics/sounds/other kinds of immersion: learning new stuff and doing ones best(within limits of course, as in not being too serious about it) and working together in trying to win matches in a team game. I guess it could be called good sportsmanship.
Edited by Joseph Mallan, 16 July 2015 - 01:36 AM.
#40
Posted 16 July 2015 - 01:42 AM
Erkki, on 16 July 2015 - 01:32 AM, said:
For some of us good part of the enjoyment comes from things other than graphics/sounds/other kinds of immersion: learning new stuff and doing ones best(within limits of course, as in not being too serious about it) and working together in trying to win matches in a team game. I guess it could be called good sportsmanship.
You can also be really seriouz about it! Who says that we shouldn't be? Especially when itz about winning!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users