00ohDstruct, on 16 July 2015 - 05:25 PM, said:
Well... have they considered HATS? After all... TF2 did damn well with just that. Um... perhaps P2W weapons like some FPS games do... or what about KEYS to open mystery boxes? Call them LOST TECH CACHES! JUST BUY ONE COMSTAR KEY!
Have they considered MICRO-transactions instead of "Here's my paycheck" transactions?
I think they're MAD not to have - but the issue will be the ambiguity of it all. Packs... well, packs
sell. They have a well established and effective infrastructure built around them. The team will be well practiced in churning out new mechs.
Other systems though... PGI would know that cosmetic-o-rama will be popular, but
how popular? When will they see a return on diverting and investing resources into new systems? Ambiguous!
THEY SHOULD DO IT THOUGH. I would micro transact the **** out of unique geometry, more paint, decals... I want my mechs to look like
my mechs. Retina searing hot pink, incredibly reflective chrome, an Atlas with a Jason hockey mask... OR YES, HATS. AN ATLAS WITH A TOP HAT. TAKE MY GODDAMN MONEY.