Jump to content

Next Banwave?


66 replies to this topic

#61 Mystere

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 22,783 posts
  • LocationClassified

Posted 24 July 2015 - 01:28 PM

View PostKristov Kerensky, on 24 July 2015 - 12:27 PM, said:

Mystere, the dichotomy of your statements about the name and shame compared to your sigline...really cracks me up, especially with that bonfire pic you just posted :)


It can't be helped. I'm a real life pyromaniac ... among other things. :ph34r:

Edited by Mystere, 24 July 2015 - 01:30 PM.


#62 Zolaz

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 3,510 posts
  • LocationHouston, Tx

Posted 24 July 2015 - 03:58 PM

How long did it take to get the first wave of 60 bans? Hope the next wave doesnt take as long to arrive.

#63 oldradagast

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • 4,833 posts

Posted 24 July 2015 - 04:48 PM

View PostAdiuvo, on 24 July 2015 - 12:28 PM, said:

Out of all the players banned, only 1 was notable at all and she long had suspicions about her from proven people before she got banned. Everyone else were randos.

In 99% of cheating claims, replies of 'git gud' are warranted.


Thanks for missing the point entirely. The problem was people claiming that "cheating is impossible" followed by idiocy such as "but I'm so good, people think I'm cheating."

Gotta love the internet - a place where people reply without reading, may as well be functionally illiterate, and consider it more important to polish their epeen than actually address a problem in a game.

But, hey - so long as the cheaters aren't top tier, I guess some people are ok with it. Lol.... idiocy... :rolleyes:

Edited by oldradagast, 24 July 2015 - 04:51 PM.


#64 Adiuvo

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 2,078 posts

Posted 24 July 2015 - 06:00 PM

View Postoldradagast, on 24 July 2015 - 04:48 PM, said:


Thanks for missing the point entirely. The problem was people claiming that "cheating is impossible" followed by idiocy such as "but I'm so good, people think I'm cheating."

Gotta love the internet - a place where people reply without reading, may as well be functionally illiterate, and consider it more important to polish their epeen than actually address a problem in a game.

But, hey - so long as the cheaters aren't top tier, I guess some people are ok with it. Lol.... idiocy... :rolleyes:

The point is that despite cheats existing, evidently they don't have much of an impact on everyone's gameplay experience. If someone feels the need to toss out cheat accusations without any proof, as often did happen, they typically need to 'git gud.'

But go on, keep believing in the monster under your bed.

#65 Johnny Z

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 9,942 posts
  • LocationDueling on Solaris

Posted 24 July 2015 - 06:13 PM

View PostAdiuvo, on 24 July 2015 - 06:00 PM, said:

The point is that despite cheats existing, evidently they don't have much of an impact on everyone's gameplay experience. If someone feels the need to toss out cheat accusations without any proof, as often did happen, they typically need to 'git gud.'

But go on, keep believing in the monster under your bed.


Really? Cheats are getting brave these days or what?

#66 GeistHrafn

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 450 posts
  • LocationMB, Canada

Posted 24 July 2015 - 06:28 PM

Cheating discussion is unfortunately not permitted on the forums folks. PGI is doing their job, as evidenced by the bans that have already happened.

Off to the birds with this thread.

#67 Dimento Graven

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Guillotine
  • Guillotine
  • 6,208 posts

Posted 26 July 2015 - 10:04 AM

View PostRhazien, on 24 July 2015 - 06:28 PM, said:

Cheating discussion is unfortunately not permitted on the forums folks. PGI is doing their job, as evidenced by the bans that have already happened.

Off to the birds with this thread.
We'll agree to disagree.

We can see they 'did their job' ONCE, but as yet, other than unproven words we have no evidence that they are in fact, actively doing anything.



1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users