

I Run 3 Back Armor And I Got ***** By An Arctic Cheetah
#1
Posted 21 August 2015 - 07:42 AM
#3
Posted 21 August 2015 - 07:44 AM
#5
Posted 21 August 2015 - 07:46 AM
#6
Posted 21 August 2015 - 07:48 AM
#7
Posted 21 August 2015 - 07:48 AM
Learn2checksurroundings
Edited by Imperius, 21 August 2015 - 07:49 AM.
#8
Posted 21 August 2015 - 07:48 AM
That's an awful lot of rear armour.
#10
Posted 21 August 2015 - 08:04 AM
#11
Posted 21 August 2015 - 08:09 AM
#12
Posted 21 August 2015 - 08:10 AM
#13
Posted 21 August 2015 - 08:10 AM

#14
Posted 21 August 2015 - 08:39 AM
Sug, on 21 August 2015 - 07:46 AM, said:
I think it's alright to go under 5 armor on a light mech, mainly because their total armor pool is smaller to begin with. Also more agility to help keep people away from your butt...
#15
Posted 21 August 2015 - 09:05 AM

#16
Posted 21 August 2015 - 09:07 AM
Monkey Lover, on 21 August 2015 - 09:05 AM, said:

Actually, the main reason for frontloaded armor is because getting attacked from behind is vastly less common than being attacked from the front. Why put armor in a place that rarely gets hit?
#17
Posted 21 August 2015 - 09:08 AM
#19
Posted 21 August 2015 - 09:14 AM
#20
Posted 21 August 2015 - 09:15 AM
Mizeur, on 21 August 2015 - 09:14 AM, said:
I actually once heard about a TT exploit like that...Load up a mech with its entire arsenal being rear-mounted, and then put all of its armor loaded to the back...then walk backwards into the fight lol.
It worked because rear-facing weapons had a lower BattleValue than frontal weapons...
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users