Yokaiko, on 08 September 2015 - 02:53 AM, said:
5" inch guns lob a 70 pound warhead over 7 miles.....which is actually the visual distance due to the curvature of the Earth.
PS I'm a weapons tech for the Department of the Navy =D
PS interesting but did not make your point. Adding secondary guns again was more about size getting much larger and having secondary needs like anti aircraft. Thats why like battleships the main guns are still the main factor. Its why both ships you mentioned had batteries of nine VERY large main guns.
Steinar Bergstol, on 08 September 2015 - 02:53 AM, said:
Screw the meta. I will run what I like, and you will smile and say "Thank you, sir."
Or in other words: People will run what they think is fun, and that is their right. Personally I think you all should be forced to run stock only.

Never suggested there should be a rule you have to run good builds. But some people just do not understand how much they are handicapping themselves

If you understand it and are a masochist well thats OK by me haha.
cdlord, on 08 September 2015 - 02:56 AM, said:
I use mixed loadouts because I refuse to use the meta-crutch. I refuse to join the L33T hack meta tryhards who are wrecking the spirit of this game with their alpha-warrior playstyle. I do pretty well for myself too and I am not the least bit affected by the nerfs when they do come down the line.
How many ACH players with cry foul when that chassis is fixed?
Who will cry foul when the quirks are all reworked?
Who will protest a laser nerf or general heat adjustment?
I will not be among them.
Changes are coming down the pipe. I don't expect to be affected by them much.
So you really think balance changes are going to make min max meta type builds not a thing?