How Do Maulers Seem To People Without Maulers?
#21
Posted 10 September 2015 - 09:09 AM
#22
Posted 10 September 2015 - 09:13 AM
#23
Posted 10 September 2015 - 09:21 AM
#24
Posted 10 September 2015 - 09:34 AM
Facing Maulers seems average.
Edited by Sethliopod, 10 September 2015 - 09:35 AM.
#25
Posted 10 September 2015 - 09:36 AM
4x LRM 5 + Artemis, 2x TAG, 2x UAC/5 .......
Maybe I don't want to see my tier that badly after all....
#26
Posted 10 September 2015 - 09:40 AM
pretty easy to kill but unlike the awesome you cant afford to ignore it. it drops laughably fast to focus fire though.
if they ever fix pinpoint damage so assault mechs dont obliterated instantly by focus fire, this thing might be a force to be reckoned with.
Edited by Khobai, 10 September 2015 - 09:43 AM.
#27
Posted 10 September 2015 - 09:43 AM
That means they always have some kind of Achilles heel you can easily exploit to deal with them.
#28
Posted 10 September 2015 - 09:44 AM
#29
Posted 10 September 2015 - 09:47 AM
#30
Posted 10 September 2015 - 09:47 AM
Let that sink in a moment...
#31
Posted 10 September 2015 - 09:58 AM
Then theres those who make this mech live up to its name, good loadouts that simply maul their targets, good positioning, good shielding, which if done right makes the Mauler very very tanky.
Overall, i find the Mauler to have the potential to be one scary motherf****r.
#32
Posted 10 September 2015 - 11:47 AM
Usually when I see one, there are three more, since everyone and their grandma seems to have bought the pack. Four Maulers at once is a liiiiitle much to fight.
Most of the people I've been fighting probably don't have the basics done on their MALs yet, let alone master/elite. It's hard to say if that will make much of a difference when fighting them.
#33
Posted 10 September 2015 - 12:15 PM
#34
Posted 10 September 2015 - 12:17 PM
Stand in front of it, and you'll have a bad day. Unless you're a Gigawhale. The Hexa 5 Build has some nasty PPFLD, provided the pilot has any accuracy. The quad LB10x is hilarious for heavies and assaults, but brutally effective against mediums and lights. I would not recommend Gauss, but that might just be because I was in an Autoshotty CN9-D, and was critting those things out like crazy.
Basically, it is the IS version of the Whale, but without Clantech.
Oh, and the SRM variant was..... interesting. I think the Launchers are too high for good SRM use, as more than once the entire flight shot over my head.
Lolrms can be pretty intimidating, if you don't do all the usual counter measures to LRMs, or get caught with your pants down. But, if you're having trouble with LRMs, then that's not the Maulers fault.
#35
Posted 10 September 2015 - 12:19 PM
#36
Posted 10 September 2015 - 12:29 PM
732 - 7 hardpoints
732B - 8 hardpoints
733 - 7 hardpoints
733C - 7 hardpoints
733P - 7 hardpoints
MAL-1P - 8 hardpoints
MAL-1R - 8 hardpoints
MAL-2P - 10 hardpoints
MAL-MX90 - 10 hardpoints
Oh, and they're not distributed to different sides. The Mauler isn't made utterly harmless if you take out a single side torso. And don't talk to me about equpping SRMs. Even if I bring 4xSRM6, who the hell is dumb enough to walk into range of my plodding, fat Highlander, armed only with SRMs? Nobody.
And what does my Highlander get? Instead of dual gauss, 4xUAC5, 2xAC20, what does the Highlander get? What is the big advantage the Highlander has over the Mauler?
6-8 tons of jump jets that do nothing
Edited by Alistair Winter, 10 September 2015 - 12:29 PM.
#37
Posted 10 September 2015 - 12:46 PM
#38
Posted 10 September 2015 - 12:56 PM
Gas Guzzler, on 10 September 2015 - 08:06 AM, said:
OP? Too many guns? UP/no big deal?
Anyone crying for nerfs?
I see them as another assault taking up a spot on my team where I'd rather have a 100t.
#39
Posted 10 September 2015 - 01:11 PM
#40
Posted 10 September 2015 - 01:24 PM
Also as a Locust pilot? I love the Mauler, mannaged to draw some of those SRM meds to a toe to toe with friendly Maulers. The Mauler has saved me a number of times for quick getaways.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users