Jump to content

Na Server High Latency From Au


8 replies to this topic

#1 Better Call Saul

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 144 posts

Posted 13 September 2015 - 08:42 PM

My ping is usually 280ms, now I'm @ 350ms++???

C:\>tracert mwomercs.com

Tracing route to mwomercs.com [192.99.109.192]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms home.gateway.home.gateway [192.168.1.254]
2 76 ms 75 ms 76 ms lo0.bng1.per1.on.ii.net [150.101.32.85]
3 11 ms 16 ms 11 ms ae8.cr2.per1.on.ii.net [150.101.33.124]
4 201 ms 204 ms 207 ms aex.cr1.adl2.on.ii.net [150.101.33.18]
5 205 ms 126 ms 134 ms ae16.br1.syd4.on.ii.net [150.101.33.188]
6 272 ms 271 ms 287 ms te0-1-1-2.br2.lax1.on.ii.net [203.16.213.190]
7 213 ms 213 ms 212 ms any2ix.coresite.com [206.72.210.214]
8 271 ms 261 ms 330 ms nwk-5-a9.nj.us [198.27.73.165]
9 342 ms 341 ms 354 ms bhs-g2-a9.qc.ca [198.27.73.207]
10 330 ms 327 ms 273 ms 198.27.73.233
11 337 ms 349 ms 363 ms mwomercs.com [192.99.109.192]

Trace complete.

#2 Carl Vickers

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Covert
  • The Covert
  • 2,649 posts
  • LocationPerth

Posted 13 September 2015 - 08:49 PM

With that kind of ping you could possibly be in WA Saul. I am in WA.

I noticed that my ping is around 370-380ms where I normally get 270-280ms.

This issue I found with a tracert was my ISP(iinet) appears to be routing the packets to Hong Kong then to Japan and then to NA.

I have a contact in iinet that told me the routing is a little borked and they are working on it, dont bother contacting support as their techs dont have a very good idea(none at all actually) of whats going on.

Just did a test at work and getting 275ms, with a different provider at work of course.

Edited by Carl, 13 September 2015 - 09:11 PM.


#3 Better Call Saul

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 144 posts

Posted 13 September 2015 - 09:32 PM

yeah mate I'm in Perth! last night the trace looked wrong heading via Asia, that trace is heading via Syd which is better, now the issue looks like its in Canada?

#4 Carl Vickers

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Covert
  • The Covert
  • 2,649 posts
  • LocationPerth

Posted 13 September 2015 - 09:39 PM

Ill test when I get home but it looks like that 8th hop is where your trouble began. So somewhere after New Jersey is where it appears to be going downhill.

You dont happen to be with iinet?

#5 Better Call Saul

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 144 posts

Posted 13 September 2015 - 10:22 PM

Yeah I'm with iiNet, issue might be on the mend?
Pinging mwomercs.com [192.99.109.192] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.99.109.192: bytes=32 time=296ms TTL=52
Reply from 192.99.109.192: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=52
Reply from 192.99.109.192: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=52
Reply from 192.99.109.192: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=52

#6 Carl Vickers

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Covert
  • The Covert
  • 2,649 posts
  • LocationPerth

Posted 13 September 2015 - 10:45 PM

Sweet, my calls and complaints yesterday did not go astray woot. Now I should be able get some decent numbers.

#7 Bobby Jubraj

    Staff

  • Developer
  • Developer
  • 111 posts

Posted 15 September 2015 - 03:36 PM

Just wanted to check up with you Carl and see if you were seeing better ping results now with iiNet, as Better Call Saul(such an awesome show) already let me know that he's seeing better results.

#8 Carl Vickers

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Covert
  • The Covert
  • 2,649 posts
  • LocationPerth

Posted 15 September 2015 - 03:44 PM

Hi Bobby,

Tis all better now, from a contact within iinet I found out they had put some redundant routes in which for some reason had become the default routes, it was changed back on Monday my contact brought it to their attention.

Edited by Carl, 15 September 2015 - 03:45 PM.


#9 Bobby Jubraj

    Staff

  • Developer
  • Developer
  • 111 posts

Posted 15 September 2015 - 03:47 PM

Awesome that's great to hear and thanks for getting back to me!





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users