83 replies to this topic

[Burktross]

There's a **** ton of ECM, yeah, but there's a more than healthy dosage of BAP countering it at any given moment. The fact that my Kit Fox's ECM is only useful 1/8th of the the time is somewhat frustrating :^(

[Davers]

DarthRevis, on 08 October 2015 - 10:11 PM, said:

I have never heard that Artemis only work when you have LOS...you sure about that?

Artemis only works if you have LoS.

Novakaine, on 08 October 2015 - 11:44 PM, said:

Especially joyful to watch an entire salvo hit a single limb on forest colony and evaporate.

Some of those trees act like a huge anti-LRM net, don't they?

JaxRiot, on 09 October 2015 - 06:25 AM, said:

I come back after a 4 month break and the ECM argument is still going on. Ahh its good to be home.

Welcome back. We kept all the old arguments warm for you.

Gas Guzzler, on 09 October 2015 - 11:19 AM, said:

B-B-B-But then why did we diverge from the Gauss PPC meta??? That must have been the closest to TT we had ever been! As all these no doubt extremely intelligent masters of this game have said before, if we followed TT we would have a perfectly balanced game. I guess we should go back to Gauss/PPCs then, in the name of TT, because obviously a turn-based dice rolling board game translates perfectly to a tactical FPS computer game.

Well, CBT also had a short range "crit seeking" meta at the same time it had a long range 'sniping meta'. So in a way, it is still a more diverse meta than MWO.

[SolCrusher]

strikebrch, on 11 October 2015 - 06:34 PM, said:

Well , with the incoming rebalance which will wipe out all quirks i would not suggest to spend any CBs in case you don't have those mechs.

Seeing how neither of these chassis have quirks that a specific to the load out provided, I would think they should pass the re-balancing unless they remove hard points.