Jump to content

Shadowcat Sensor Range.


4 replies to this topic

#1 Livewyr

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 6,733 posts
  • LocationWisconsin, USA

Posted 04 November 2015 - 04:27 PM

Can someone explain to me why the Shadowcat has -333 and -377 Sensor ranges on the CT?
The Shadowcat is an overgrown light mech...
Even the storm crow has only -277 Sensor range tied to it.

What gives?

#2 Dracol

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Steadfast
  • The Steadfast
  • 2,539 posts
  • LocationSW Florida

Posted 04 November 2015 - 04:51 PM

The first difference between the shadowcat and the stormcrow that jumps to my mind are jump jets.

Having utilized jump lights for scouting on the live server, I can say the shadowcat if it had equal range would out class stormcrows in the sensor department.

#3 Livewyr

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 6,733 posts
  • LocationWisconsin, USA

Posted 04 November 2015 - 04:57 PM

View PostDracol, on 04 November 2015 - 04:51 PM, said:

The first difference between the shadowcat and the stormcrow that jumps to my mind are jump jets.

Having utilized jump lights for scouting on the live server, I can say the shadowcat if it had equal range would out class stormcrows in the sensor department.


It should outclass the SCR in sensors... considering it has almost 10 tons less podspace, on top of having less armor and fewer hardpoints.

#4 Jack Shayu Walker

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The God
  • The God
  • 1,451 posts

Posted 08 November 2015 - 06:35 PM

I agree with you there Livewyr, the shadowcat needs sensor buffs not nerfs.

#5 ChapeL

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 1,363 posts

Posted 09 November 2015 - 12:34 AM

If the Shadow Cat has the best sensor suite in the game, it would still be in no danger of outclassing the Stormcrow.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users