6 replies to this topic

[El Bandito]

First game--Bog Conquest, second game--Mining Conquest, third game--Caustic Skirmish, fourth game--Canyon Conquest, fifth game--River City Assault.

Conquest seems popular now, which is just fine. Players in my queue are having enough variety. Tweeted Russ to keep the voting system and he replied to me the voting system will be kept, but with some tweaks. Nice.

Quote

Russ Bullock ‏@russ_bullock 45m
@TrueBandito will keep but we have a tweak coming which I think will make it better

Edited by El Bandito, 11 November 2015 - 09:41 PM.

[Mazzyplz]

whatever, he also said he wouldn't put third person in the game.

i'll wait and see if this gets removed or not - i don't care about mode voting anyways

[Troutmonkey]

Back during the Oceanic takeover event I recorded that on the Oceanic server the majority of games were Conquest, and on the US server it was Skirmish.

What games you get definitely relies on who and when you play.

[ChapeL]

I've had the same observation. US prime time was skirmish wall to wall ( Frozen city/HPG mostly ) while Euro server during US prime time was more diversified.

[Tuis Ryche]

Yay, Conquest.

Not.

Getting awful sick of this voting ****. It's getting almost too easy to predict the outcomes at first glance when that screen comes up.

[adamts01]

Oceanic perspective:

The first few days it was all skirmish on the same maps. Now it's much more balanced, still skirmish heavy, and not much Tera Therma. I still think voting should go, but I'm all in favor of keeping the community unified, match times have been greatly sped up, from what I can tell.

[DarthHias]

I´m also feeling the diversity coming back. When Frozen / HPG Skirmish happens I´m so prepared I just murder

Some maps are still getting shafted though.