Who Wins The Mech Scale Lottery? Scale Comparisons Listed, Requests Welcome.
#21
Posted 04 December 2015 - 10:53 AM
I want to believe those are scaled right to each other and would be a good starting point, but man I feel like im going to be surprised at the results.
#22
Posted 04 December 2015 - 11:02 AM
Deathlike, on 04 December 2015 - 10:43 AM, said:
Well, they have yet to finish/address the last mech that hasn't gotten the dynamic visual hardpoints.... the Stalker.
which has what to do with my comment?
Fup commented on the NVA and CPLT. Those are going to be worked on starting in a little over a week. Nothing more, nothing less.
So, ya know, just what is the price of Tea in China?
#23
Posted 04 December 2015 - 11:09 AM
Apparently about 50 cents.
And its interesting, the price of tea in china, relates directly to the price of electronics made in China, since their controlled market is heavily manipulated to keep prices where the Chinese Government wants it.
So with consumer items like Tea, you can tell when there are price dives or hikes, that concurrent rises falls will happen in their exports.
Totally relevant.
Edited by Kraftwerkedup, 04 December 2015 - 11:10 AM.
#24
Posted 04 December 2015 - 12:30 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 04 December 2015 - 11:02 AM, said:
Fup commented on the NVA and CPLT. Those are going to be worked on starting in a little over a week. Nothing more, nothing less.
So, ya know, just what is the price of Tea in China?
I'm not even sure why you are so worked up on a slight tangent.
The Stalker in some ways is benefiting from the current skewed scaling. In fact, the running joke is that the Stalker is the size of a Catapult, when viewed from the front. In some ways it's similar to what a Marauder looks like from the front.. just minus the durability or effectiveness of a Stalker (they serve different roles and whatnot, but I'm strictly talking about shape/size - like the joke Marauder vs Nova comparison).
The only thing you should honestly hope for is a proper revamping of the Catapult's (missile) "ear"/arm hardpoints as part of the entire process.
#25
Posted 04 December 2015 - 01:42 PM
Deathlike, on 04 December 2015 - 12:30 PM, said:
I'm not even sure why you are so worked up on a slight tangent.
The Stalker in some ways is benefiting from the current skewed scaling. In fact, the running joke is that the Stalker is the size of a Catapult, when viewed from the front. In some ways it's similar to what a Marauder looks like from the front.. just minus the durability or effectiveness of a Stalker (they serve different roles and whatnot, but I'm strictly talking about shape/size - like the joke Marauder vs Nova comparison).
The only thing you should honestly hope for is a proper revamping of the Catapult's (missile) "ear"/arm hardpoints as part of the entire process.
Who's worked up?
Asked a simple question...what remote point were you trying to make toward my comment?
Not sure how you equate that to getting in a tizzy, unless you are projecting your own feelings into things?
As for the Rescale, I would comment that you have no more actual info as to what to expect than I do. All I pointed out is that they ARE getting rescaled, forthwith.
Again. Fupdup commented on something. I pointed out that those mechs are going to be addressed starting shortly. So what possible point are you trying to make in regard to that about the Stalker?
What, that becuase they haven't done the dynamic hardpoints on it, that they won't do the rescale? That they shouldn't?
Could you IDK...actually explain the point you're trying to make?
#26
Posted 04 December 2015 - 02:02 PM
If its not evidence, then no one has any idea what to expect.
Clearly theres scaling problems now.
#27
Posted 04 December 2015 - 02:14 PM
Kraftwerkedup, on 04 December 2015 - 02:02 PM, said:
If its not evidence, then no one has any idea what to expect.
Clearly theres scaling problems now.
Well, I have these old Nova files, we can compare (inside out/side by side) the new one to it.
Should be a nice comparison.
Getting started on the Stalker Cat Mad now.
#28
Posted 04 December 2015 - 05:48 PM
Kraftwerkedup, on 04 December 2015 - 02:02 PM, said:
If its not evidence, then no one has any idea what to expect.
Clearly theres scaling problems now.
which makes have they rescaled in the past?
#29
Posted 04 December 2015 - 06:55 PM
This what you want for a side profile Bishop?
Rest of the album:
http://imgur.com/a/m2aZL
Rizzelbizzeg, on 04 December 2015 - 09:01 AM, said:
Rest of the album:
http://imgur.com/a/KruTV
Kraftwerkedup, on 04 December 2015 - 10:47 AM, said:
Ive always wanted to know.
And man...they arent good. PGI that is. At well... anything.
EDIT:
Oh and Banshee vs Atlas if you got the time.
Soon™
Kraftwerkedup, on 04 December 2015 - 10:53 AM, said:
I want to believe those are scaled right to each other and would be a good starting point, but man I feel like im going to be surprised at the results.
#30
Posted 06 December 2015 - 02:16 AM
Kraftwerkedup, on 04 December 2015 - 10:47 AM, said:
Ive always wanted to know.
And man...they arent good. PGI that is. At well... anything.
EDIT:
Oh and Banshee vs Atlas if you got the time.
Banshee VS Atlas first:
Close enough. Damn sight better than the Victor/MAD
http://imgur.com/a/81xBo
BNC VS Cent
Well, nearly double the weight, and certainly wide, but not the worst comparison I've seen.
Rest of it:
http://imgur.com/a/8pcXI
Kraftwerkedup, on 04 December 2015 - 10:53 AM, said:
I want to believe those are scaled right to each other and would be a good starting point, but man I feel like im going to be surprised at the results.
Well, strange request, but can be accommodated.
Make of it what you will:
http://imgur.com/a/QsOji
I'll be quite honest: I prefer the Quad UAC look on the Cicada.
Edited by Mcgral18, 06 December 2015 - 02:17 AM.
#32
Posted 06 December 2015 - 03:38 AM
#34
Posted 06 December 2015 - 09:53 AM
huehuehue
#35
Posted 06 December 2015 - 10:03 AM
Mcgral18, on 04 December 2015 - 06:55 PM, said:
This what you want for a side profile Bishop?
now go on the open street and ask people what kind of tonnage class these would be.
I would say Assault, medium, heavy
Edited by Lily from animove, 06 December 2015 - 10:05 AM.
#36
Posted 06 December 2015 - 10:27 AM
#37
Posted 06 December 2015 - 10:46 AM
Yeonne Greene, on 06 December 2015 - 10:27 AM, said:
http://imgur.com/a/lhPt9
Seems reasonable enough.
#38
Posted 06 December 2015 - 10:53 AM
Navid A1, on 03 December 2015 - 11:09 PM, said:
Specific comparisons?
Errors start happening (textures disappear) when too many things pop in.
I've not fully tested just what the breaking point is, but specific mechs simplify things.
I think I've got the import procedure down, so it's much faster to do now (and also have a set of working Import texts, which means instant models).
#39
Posted 06 December 2015 - 02:32 PM
Also that Grasshopper and Highlander are the LOD models, which have much less polygons and are used to replace the regular meshes at higher distances.
#40
Posted 06 December 2015 - 02:37 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users