So I Bought A Battlemaster
#1
Posted 20 December 2015 - 07:25 AM
[Insert_epicmusic.mp4] Once again I am in need of your guidance and wisdom [end_epicmusic.mp4]
I was in need of an assault mech so I bought a Battlemaster. the 3M and 1S variants
on the 1S i run 4 ERLlas whilst on the 3M I run 3 Llas and 1 Gauss. Are those things even remotely viable? If no can anyone suggest anything?
What should be the last variant to get?
#2
Posted 20 December 2015 - 07:44 AM
#3
Posted 20 December 2015 - 08:07 AM
Edited by MerryIguana, 20 December 2015 - 08:08 AM.
#4
Posted 21 December 2015 - 04:58 PM
1s - http://mwo.smurfy-ne...66500f3f80131bb
Edited by Bruce13F4O, 21 December 2015 - 05:07 PM.
#5
Posted 21 December 2015 - 10:09 PM
make sure to guard your XL engine with your arm shields. moves fast and works well when skill tree is mastered. once mastered, you have 3 good alphas before you risk over heating. from there you can either chain fire the lasers while going depending mostly on your AC'5s or you can just cool shot and alpha a couple more times and rip into someone. surprisingly enough, because the arms are so large, I dont get XL'd so much. still, the next build is much safer to use...
more tanky version (with more heat problems): http://mwo.smurfy-ne...8081d140ce2b163
its a bit slower, but runs a std engine. you can replace the LL with ERLL (or remove some heatsinks for a PPC)- this build gets hot because you do not have ballistics to cool down with. this build can zombie for a long time, since your main armament is the torso mounted medium lasers.
in both builds the 6 medium lasers can really pack a punch. but run really hot, so make sure you have an extra weapon grouping for chain fire.
#6
Posted 22 December 2015 - 02:11 AM
I don't like the idea of running an XL on an assault though, I feel it's too slow to dodge anything and too fragile in an XL
Edited by Airanthus, 22 December 2015 - 02:12 AM.
#7
Posted 26 December 2015 - 10:42 AM
Your wasting the potential of your 3M. That many energy hardpoints begs for boating lasers.
There is no "wrong" Battlemaster loadout. Your choice of weapons greatly depends on your engines and the available free mass for weapons. The Battlemaster can easily use any engine in the 300-400 range be it standard or XL.
For a third variant I highly recommend the 2C. It works well with the stock engine. I run a mixed range energy loadout with dual AMS.
Edited by Spheroid, 26 December 2015 - 10:43 AM.
#8
Posted 02 January 2016 - 05:05 PM
Airanthus, on 22 December 2015 - 02:11 AM, said:
I don't like the idea of running an XL on an assault though, I feel it's too slow to dodge anything and too fragile in an XL
On the contrary, the SPEED will open up new dimensions on that mech. The battlemaster is still quite XL friendly. The ct can take lots and those arms with high shoulders can soak up lots of damage. The 2C should really be looked at. Endo, XL 375, 2 ams, 2 med pulse, 3 large pulse, 20 total DHS. It has like 4 extra tonns of internal armor, runs at 76kph, has twist and accel, decel buffs! It can really put up some numbers.
#9
Posted 02 January 2016 - 09:18 PM
#10
Posted 02 January 2016 - 09:38 PM
Pretty sure the -2C is the second one. As for a third BLR, I'm wondering what everyone thinks. I don't want to do LRMs, but an SRM brawler isn't out of the question...
Edited by TheRAbbi, 02 January 2016 - 09:38 PM.
#11
Posted 02 January 2016 - 09:47 PM
#12
Posted 02 January 2016 - 10:08 PM
#13
Posted 11 January 2016 - 10:19 PM
Running the -2C as my brawler-ish assault, with 5x MPL and 2x ASRM-6. Not the GREATEST alpha, but it can dump that a couple of times without overheating, and the quirks are good enough.
Doing the ERLLs on my -1G(P). MIGHT switch those over to the -1S, though, for even LONGER RANGED FUN! Optimal range gets like 900+ on that thing with the ERLL range module, IIRC. That's messing-up paint at over a mile! But still, the BLARGH! runs 5 of 'em, and cool enough that I'm alright taking it on Hellebore Springs (the CW Canyon Network, I call it). Just don't alpha strike!
Huh. Been 9 days, and I've gotten the -1G(P) through ELITE, and the -1S and -2C through BASIC. Been FUN! I finally like an assault mech well enough to NOT dread having to drive it!
#14
Posted 11 January 2016 - 10:43 PM
I wouldn't bother with the ballistic mount given what you get for the tonnage, though I have ran a pair of SRM6's from time to time on the 2C for kicks on fairly hot builds.
The 2C was one of my favorite mechs on release and post rebalance and still manages to be after along with the 1S and 1G. I actually really like the hero variant as well; the Hellslinger it's lovely on hot maps even as an energy boat and is fairly unique in that regard. I played them so much (especially in CW previously on the IS side as a loyalist) though I've moved on to pet projects and levelling up mechs that don't need the XP in them.
I'm honestly not a fan of using STD engines in them; it feels like I'd be better off using a Stalker at that point given just how crazy XL friendly (and -fast- for an Assault, not to mention responsive Torso Twist wise) the Battlemasters are are. Everyone said "never put an Xl in any assault". BS, no really, BS. The craziness you can do with the Battlemaster was more than well worth it on my end.
I'd use the STDs here and there for variety until you get used to them and shielding with their arms, but I got them specifically because they were one of the few Assaults on the IS side that did XL very well (and they only do it better now despite the mobility hits that came down the pipe all around with even better survivability).
The big XLs also let you cram the DHS in like no tomorrow allowing for bigger punch yet fairly cool builds without much issue, and it's a fairly unique experience to be zipping around in an Assault with a solid punch and Heavy mech speeds vs the usual "walking through tar" experience you get with most others. At least either engine type, you're not really getting pooched, which few mechs can say.
It's obscene how slick they are with a big engine in them. The huge gorilla arms are -excellent- damage shields.
#15
Posted 29 January 2016 - 03:41 AM
#16
Posted 30 January 2016 - 10:20 AM
Otherwise I'd grab the Slinger, 2C and 1G if you're willing to grab a real dollar mech, because, you know, running cooler on Vitric/Terra Therma instead of hotter is nice (plus, nice camo) for variety and drop deck substitutions.
Or, just wait until they select a Battlemaster Champion, (likely the 2c, but never know), and grab the mech bundle when it's finally released with the Hellslinger. Though odds are they'll likely gimp the third choice as one of the less optimal Battlemaster builds.
#17
Posted 30 January 2016 - 12:04 PM
Airanthus, on 22 December 2015 - 02:11 AM, said:
I don't like the idea of running an XL on an assault though, I feel it's too slow to dodge anything and too fragile in an XL
The thing is that in certain heavies and assaults, XL engines actually make them *more* survivable because of the faster torso twisting and movement that the larger engine size allows. The Battlemaster is an example of this for an assault, and the Grasshopper is the perfect example for a heavy.
Additionally it allows you to carry enough weapons to compete well. Think of it like this: instead of taking minimum weapons with a slow STD engine, or maximum weapons with an XL of similar rating, you take a sufficient amount of weapons with an XL of higher rating. That gives you both extra firepower and more speed, and in BLR the best way to survive getting hit is to twist fast enough to bring those giant gorilla arms into the path of the enemy shots.
Edited by grendeldog, 30 January 2016 - 12:13 PM.
#18
Posted 30 January 2016 - 12:41 PM
Cryll Ankiseth, on 24 December 2015 - 07:20 PM, said:
Big XLy engines might be a death trap for your torso, but they tend to allow you to do the twist faster and with greater range; combined this with your speed and you'll be surprising alot of people with how fast you move and twist.
Engine size has nothing to do with your twist range - unless you're talking about turn speed?
#19
Posted 01 February 2016 - 02:34 AM
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users