57 replies to this topic

[Bishop Steiner]

In total Matches, KDr, W/L, Avg Dmg and Avg XP?

To get some sense of accuracy, I figure on listing only mechs with a MINIMUM of 50 matches currently in Stats (otherwise, my SHD-2D would be top killer, with an 11 KDr and 5-1 W/L... but since it only has 6 matches...... not really indicative.). And yes, I realize our Stat Tracking is at times rather fickle, though the biggest issues seems to be Weapon Stats and Map Stats.

Is it about Epeen? Not with my Mediocre Stats. Just was curious if the numbers lined up where I thought they might and was surprised in several instances to see where they did not. And also where my Top Performers ranked compared to my Base Stats.

My current "Global Stats" sit at:
Tier: 2
Total Matches: 2548
K/Dr: 1.81
W/L: 1.12
Avg Dmg: N/A
Avg XP: 1232.43

Not exactly setting the world on fire here. Mind you, I have not belonged to a unit in over a year, and less than 100 of those were done in any sort of group settings. It's the PUGlife for me, yo. Definitely harder to boost the W/L compared to Unit Drops (my archived W/L where about half my drops were in unit, is a 1.34, from a very NON Comp unit). The rest? Seem to fit my belief that I'm simply a "High Average" Player.



Biggest surprises? How well my utterly Non-Meta ON1-VA did (probably shouldn't have, it has my highest Match Dmg, and is tied for most Match Kills), How small the average Damage difference was despite including Medium, Heavy and Assault Mechs, and how good of an XP earner my CN9-D is. Still, with it's all or nothing fighting style, I did not expect my Orion to take top KDr.

Biggest gripe? No stats recorded for Cbill earnings by Mech. I would LOVE to know which are the top bread winners.

As for my Map Performance, not any surprises.

Always did well on the Old Caustic Valley, and Canyon Network really caters to my more mobile fighting style. Viridian Bog I have had some of my best matches on, but it seems in general most teams I play on have ZERO idea what to actually do on the map and all to often it ends up Me vs 8-12 Red Doritos. I really hate that map. I would say Bog, New Caustic and New Forest are my most hated maps, in that order.

As for Weapon Stats? I find them so incomplete that I don't even bother. Plus as long as doing "1 tick of damage" counts as a "hit" for Lasers? Meh.

So how about you, any of your Stats surprise or disappoint you?

[MonkeyCheese]

How did you get stat sorting? I've never had that option but I can see the white arrows on your images. Or is that Photoshop reordering??

[Wrathful Scythe]

Stats, I love stats.
I cut out the mechs which didn't get much love i.e. few matches played.
Also, I play mostly solo. My unit plays mostly CW so solo it is for me.

Matches played


Honestly? I'm pretty surprised. Haven't touched one of them in a good while. I haven't played the Direwolf in months, the Stormcrow neither. The Timberwolf gets used in Cw, though the -C variant. Well, I tend to play my new mechs and new mechs are getting released almost faster then I can master them. So that means that most of my mechs don't have many matches recorded.

K/D


Those stats don't surprise me. I farmed my way from T2 to T1 only with my Locust because it got godquirks. So damn easy to play and I prefer it to every other light. It is the perfect harasser. The ACH and the TDR-5SS shouldn't be surprising as well. The 9S got it's K/D from the old ERPPC quirks.

Dmg Avg.


Warhawk wins most likely because of the low matches played. Direwolf... well, it's a Direwolf. It's expected to make dmg. The Timerwolf dropped with the LPL+ERML build so it was easy mode there, too.

Win ratio


BH2 wins? Nah, lets say the Locust is my to go mech, if I want to carry my team. Good ol' beast mode with 6 ML. Stomping mechs left and right.

Maps


And now to the big misfit of my statpage. I never understood why Terra Therma has such a good W/L ratio. Might be because I'm one of the people rushing middle if I get the chance but other than that, I don't know. Good thing: My worst map is still on a positive site.

@ MonkeyCheese: Had to look it up, too. It's a chrome plugin.
http://mwomercs.com/...-stats-sorting/

Edited by Wrathful Scythe, 05 January 2016 - 11:37 AM.

[Metus regem]

Well my stats show, that my top five performing mechs:

Timber Wolf Prime (I) 2.0 KDR with a 1.77 W/L
Hellbringer Prime (I) 1.55 KDR with a 1.5 W/L
Locust 1V 1.0 KDR with a 1.6 W/L
CN9-D Centurion 1.1 KDR with a W/L of 1.5
Nova Prime (I) 1.2 KDR with a 1.2 W/L

As you can see I consider W/L more important than KDR, with my best W/L ration on Terra Therma apparently....

[Sandpit]

I'd copy and paste if our forums weren't craptacular about that kinda thing lol and I don't ahve the time and patience at the moment to manually type it all out

Stalker (4N and Misery)
HGN-IICB
Crab (R and
Marauder (any of them)
Banshee (Malinche)

Those are my top 5 performers at the moment based on stats per match.

My CW drop deck is 2 crabs, Malinche, and Prhact (ECM variant) and it regularly turns in over 1500 damage. If the Tempest performs half as well as I think it will, it will replace the Phract and become one of my tops I'm sure.

Metus regem, on 05 January 2016 - 11:35 AM, said:

Well my stats show, that my top five performing mechs:

Timber Wolf Prime (I) 2.0 KDR with a 1.77 W/L
Hellbringer Prime (I) 1.55 KDR with a 1.5 W/L
Locust 1V 1.0 KDR with a 1.6 W/L
CN9-D Centurion 1.1 KDR with a W/L of 1.5
Nova Prime (I) 1.2 KDR with a 1.2 W/L

As you can see I consider W/L more important than KDR, with my best W/L ration on Terra Therma apparently....

Love your sig!

[Bud Crue]

Odd stats or at least surprising:

Best mech for winning matches is a crab 20 with a 4.5 w/l ratio. Not so much for killing as I have a .5 k/dr...so I win a lot of matches in the dang thing but I die doing it.

Best mech for killing is my recently purchased K-2 with a k/dr of 4.25 after a dozen matches and win loss ratio of 1.5.

Best overall (long term) performers are Black Knights. Before looking I would have thought for sure either Quickdraws or Black Jacks. They were close, but all my Black Knights were better.

One encouraging thing: Mechs I played A LOT when I first started, have as expected horrible stats. Mechs I bought more recently but have played just as many matches have FAR better stats. There is hope!

Too bad CW doesn't count toward stats (at least I don't think it does). If it did I would think my Atlas and Cataphract stats would be far different. Was shocked for a moment when I saw how few matches I have played in them (rarely pug with either but play a lot in CW)

[Metus regem]

Sandpit, on 05 January 2016 - 11:39 AM, said:

I'd copy and paste if our forums weren't craptacular about that kinda thing lol and I don't ahve the time and patience at the moment to manually type it all out

Stalker (4N and Misery)
HGN-IICB
Crab (R and
Marauder (any of them)
Banshee (Malinche)

Those are my top 5 performers at the moment based on stats per match.

My CW drop deck is 2 crabs, Malinche, and Prhact (ECM variant) and it regularly turns in over 1500 damage. If the Tempest performs half as well as I think it will, it will replace the Phract and become one of my tops I'm sure.


Love your sig!

Thanks Sandpit, I make it a point to pilot the 'bad' machines, and do well in them, proving that they are not bad at all, just people don't understand them, or try to run them in a way they are not meant to run.

My Drop deck as it currently sits:
MAL-1R
BL-6-KNT
CRB-27
YEN-LO-WANG

All give the extra space bucks, so CW is a c-bill maker for me... once the Warhammer's arrive, I'm going to try to figure out how to cram two of them in my deck....

[Michael Abt]

Tier: 3
Total Matches: 5866
K/D:1.84
W/L: 1.11

Mech:
HBK-4G(F)
4,256 matches, W/L 1.16, K/D 2.05

Only other mechs with >100 matches are my GI, 4J and 4SP. My HBKs make up 90% of my matches played, rest is spread out over 30 different mechs... i had to level some for CW.

[Nerdboard]

Michael Abt, on 05 January 2016 - 11:57 AM, said:

Tier: 3
Total Matches: 5866
K/D:1.84
W/L: 1.11

Mech:
HBK-4G(F)
4,256 matches, W/L 1.16, K/D 2.05

Only other mechs with >100 matches are my GI, 4J and 4SP. My HBKs make up 90% of my matches played, rest is spread out over 30 different mechs... i had to level some for CW.

You sir, are a true Hunchbro.

[Lukoi Banacek]

Will have to try out madstats once home from work...in the meantime:

12012 matches played
1.57 win-loss
2.54 KDR

Most played:

TBR-prime 532
BNC-3E 431
Ember 410
EBJ-prime 344
DDC 215

W/L

AS7-S 2.00 (which I found interesting as I have not played this mech since prior to its recent quirks)
BNC-3M 1.89
TBR-S 1.85
EBJ-Prime 1.69
TBR-C 1.65

KDR:

BNC-3M 4.17
VTR-DS 3.65
SCR-prime 3.44
BNC-3E 3.43
Ember 3.32

Damage per Match:

BNC-3E 555.2
TBR-prime 546.26
TBR-S 530
DWF-B 522.9
BNC-3M 517.8

XP per match:

TBR-C 3285
EBJ-prime 2045
TBR-prime 1910
EBJ-A 1900
BNC-3M 1853

The first one I'm pretty sure must have been very heavily skewed by an event or somekind of burp by PGI's data mining as it sticks so sorely out from the norm. I also have several mechs in the 4, 5 and 6k ranges with under 50 matches each that must be from double xp weekends, combined with first win bonuses or something. Certainly not reasonably indicative imo.

Edited by Lukoi Banacek, 05 January 2016 - 04:46 PM.

[MeiSooHaityu]

Yikes Bishop, putting us to work.

All my stats are PUG play BTW...

Also, about 70% of my mechs I own are under 50 matches and don't qualify FYI

Global Stats:
Tier 3
Total Matches: 2,875
KDR: 1.45
W/L 1.13
Avg XP: 1,266.63


Total Matches:

• Catapult K2 - 228
  
• Panther 10K - 145
  
• Raven 3L - 140
  
• Ilya Muromets - 131
  
• Shadow Hawk 2H - 121

KDR:

• Bounty Hunter II - 2.20KDR over 52 matches
  
• Raven 3L - 1.98KDR over 140 matches
  
• Panther 10K - 1.96 over 145 matches
  
• Jester - 1.90 over 103 matches
  
• Hunchback 4P - 1.76 over 96 matches

Win/Loss:

• Zeus 6S - 1.63
  
• Raven 3L - 1.6
  
• Centurion A - 1.42
  
• Panther 10K - 1.35
  
• Urbanmech R63 - 1.24

Avg. DMG per match:

• Bounty Hunter - 410
  
• Timber Wolf Prime - 363
  
• Ilya Muromets - 357
  
• Jester - 354
  
• Hunchback 4P - 328

Avg XP per match:

• Bounty Hunter - 1901
  
• Raven 3L - 1389
  
• Jester - 1376
  
• Enforcer 5D - 1346
  
• Panther 10K - 1275

Map W/L Ratio:

• Frozen City - 1.34
  
• Forrest Colony Snow - 1.34
  
• HPG Manifold - 1.26
  
• River City - 1.23
  
• Canyon Network - 1.21

There we go. There was a few surprises. The Panther 10K really hung in there. I haven't played the Raven 3L in ages, but when I did, I guess I was pretty good with it.

I am absolutely AMAZED on the Marauder Bounty Hunter II performance. I know I loved that mech, but Hot Damn!

Like I said though, a majority of my mechs are under 50 matches. I have been buying packs (Pheonix, Urbanmech, Resistance I and II, Marauder, etc...) so I haven't concentrated on bringing many mechs up over 50. I have some really good performers in there as well that I might have played only 30 some matches with.

Anyway, there is my list.

P.S. Although not SUPER impressive, my Urbanmech R63 did decent just missing a list or two

[Sandpit]

Metus regem, on 05 January 2016 - 11:54 AM, said:

Thanks Sandpit, I make it a point to pilot the 'bad' machines, and do well in them, proving that they are not bad at all, just people don't understand them, or try to run them in a way they are not meant to run.

My Drop deck as it currently sits:
MAL-1R
BL-6-KNT
CRB-27
YEN-LO-WANG

All give the extra space bucks, so CW is a c-bill maker for me... once the Warhammer's arrive, I'm going to try to figure out how to cram two of them in my deck....

I've made a lot of money driving my "inferior" 5LL Stalker for years now

I really think the "meta" period of MWO is headed out the window except for the most "hardcore" min/max players. It's great seeing more and more players use "bad" mechs and do well in them.

[MeiSooHaityu]

Wrathful Scythe, on 05 January 2016 - 11:33 AM, said:

@ MonkeyCheese: Had to look it up, too. It's a chrome plugin. http://mwomercs.com/...-stats-sorting/

I did it the hard way (pen, paper, calculator). Good thing I only have about 19 mechs over 50 matches out of about 80 or so. lol. That site is good to know. thanks.

[Zibmo]

Bishop Steiner, on 05 January 2016 - 10:48 AM, said:

I
Always did well on the Old Caustic Valley, and Canyon Network really caters to my more mobile fighting style. Viridian Bog I have had some of my best matches on, but it seems in general most teams I play on have ZERO idea what to actually do on the map and all to often it ends up Me vs 8-12 Red Doritos. I really hate that map. I would say Bog, New Caustic and New Forest are my most hated maps, in that order.

The Apocalypse is upon us! I actually agree with you on something. I hate those maps in the same order.

[Dino Might]

^ replace "Dylan" with "Locust"

[Navid A1]

I play 99% solo ( only CW on groups)
Also, i should say that i despise meta.. almost all my builds are non-meta scrub builds!

General stats:
Tier 1 max bar
13,350 matches
W/L 1.3
K/D 1.99
Avg XP 1195

Here are my best performing mechs based on requested stats: ( mechs with under 50 matches are excluded from the list)


Maps:





Also the archived stats ... which contains ONLY 1 MECH! The almighty ATLAS-RS:

Edited by Navid A1, 06 January 2016 - 05:46 AM.

[MeiSooHaityu]

Nice Navid! I wish I could do that well in any of my Crab mechs. I still haven't found my groove with that machine.

I'm not 4 KDR material, but I'd settle for in the 2 range .

[Navid A1]

MeiSooHaityu, on 05 January 2016 - 12:39 PM, said:

Nice Navid! I wish I could do that well in any of my Crab mechs. I still haven't found my groove with that machine.

I'm not 4 KDR material, but I'd settle for in the 2 range .

I was not expecting that either

[Bud Crue]

Some have indicated that their stats reflect CW matches. Sorry to ask a stupid question, but where do you find those stats? Mine (via my profile) appears to only reflect public (non-CW) matches.

[AlmightyAeng]

Well...here's my top 6 - also the most played...can you tell most of my time is spent in CW? I didn't have the heart to drop the Firebrand out of the group I'm guessing this places me firmly in "high average" too, Bishop. And I'm okay with that

Edited by Ghost Badger, 05 January 2016 - 12:59 PM.