Jump to content

Thunderbolt Vs. Quickdraw

Quickdraw thunderbolt IS

2 replies to this topic

#1 Kurbeks

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 337 posts

Posted 10 January 2016 - 01:51 AM

Which one chassis would you prefer? At least 1 variant will be used for CW. I know that Gman in metamechs rate Quickdraw higher.

Thoughts?

#2 Bespoke Cheese Cake

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Caladbolg
  • Caladbolg
  • 225 posts
  • LocationThem Interwebs, often in K-Town

Posted 10 January 2016 - 03:58 AM

The Quickdraw has recently had a lot of buffs applied to it due to being pretty mediocre and under used. As it currently stands the Quickdraw has enjoyed a renaissance of popularity and is rather tough for its size, however like with other mechs in the past if PGI views the current numbers as being a bit over the top they will tone it down a notch. The Thunderbolt has been a pretty solid perfomer for a while now and is comparable to other mechs of a similar size.

In the past I would have said ThunderBolt by a mile, but as it is right now I can't really say.

Edited by Bespoke Cheese Cake, 10 January 2016 - 04:00 AM.


#3 Bluttrunken

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Patron Saint
  • The Patron Saint
  • 830 posts

Posted 10 January 2016 - 04:57 AM

The Thunderbolt is a bit sturdier(especially with twisting) than the Quickdraw but lacks it's agility(turn speed, torso yaw, torso twist speed). The Quickdraw is still hindered by it's low arm mounts. Thunderbolt has a bigger punch(or maybe it just translates the available damage better). Having a majority of it's weapon in it's torso and a low horizontal yaw angle can hinder the Thunderbolt.

All in all I would consider it a matter of taste by now, given the excellent quirks the Quickdraw received. I prefer the Quickdraw(speedy skirmishers are my type of thing) but I'd simply say go for both!

Edited by k05h3lk1n, 10 January 2016 - 05:00 AM.






2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users