Jump to content

Ranked Solaris Confirmed.


43 replies to this topic

#41 Kou Uraki

    Rookie

  • The Benefactor
  • The Benefactor
  • 9 posts

Posted 30 January 2016 - 07:02 PM

I would the option to put down C-bills to bet on matches.

Edited by Kou Uraki, 30 January 2016 - 07:38 PM.


#42 sycocys

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Moderate Giver
  • Moderate Giver
  • 7,643 posts

Posted 30 January 2016 - 07:07 PM

Well then, now they are actually thinking about building blocks for their tourney system. Smaller competitive matches will be nice for when you don't have a full team online as well.

Going to laugh pretty hard though when it gets a solo only queue.

#43 Mystere

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 22,783 posts
  • LocationClassified

Posted 30 January 2016 - 11:10 PM

View PostcSand, on 29 January 2016 - 08:31 PM, said:

Should be 4v4, or 2v2.. Not 8v8, too close to what we have now.

1v1 though, nice. Count me in. That's the real deal.


Weaksauce! I want no-holds-barred winner-takes-all last-man-standing 24+ furballs! It's the only Solaris mode that has any bit of appeal for me.

Edited by Mystere, 30 January 2016 - 11:11 PM.


#44 Mystere

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 22,783 posts
  • LocationClassified

Posted 30 January 2016 - 11:23 PM

View PostAethon, on 30 January 2016 - 01:13 AM, said:

If there is some sort of stock-ish mode, or restricted build mode, I am totally down for this.

Otherwise, it will be nothing but kids spamming the flavour-of-the-month meta build all day long; in any sort of competitive gaming, people quickly throw any sort of variety or match quality out the window in favour of their easy button.


Which is why free-for-all is best. Just let the metas go at each other while you clean up in the end. Posted Image





4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users