Jump to content

Biggest Unit Wants Extra Treatment, Wtf


387 replies to this topic

#381 Mystere

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 22,783 posts
  • LocationClassified

Posted 03 February 2016 - 02:57 PM

View PostMead, on 03 February 2016 - 02:54 PM, said:

And people have said penalties have been handwaved in similar incidents before this one. Are they lying?


And why did PGI do so in those past instances? Again, pay attention to the relevant facts.

And Happy Anniversary dear thread! (i.e. 20 pages and counting Posted Image)

Edited by Mystere, 03 February 2016 - 02:58 PM.


#382 CDLord HHGD

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,190 posts
  • Location"You're not comp if you're not stock."

Posted 03 February 2016 - 02:59 PM

View PostMystere, on 03 February 2016 - 02:52 PM, said:

It's a singular act, not a series. Pay attention to the relevant facts.

Relevant facts.. OK.

This is not the first time, nor is it the second, nor the third that PGI has done something at the request of a comp team regardless of what the rest of us dirty lore purist casuals would think.

Moving MS is moot. Doing another thing for a comp team where others are being ignored.. THAT is paramount.

#383 Mead

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Little Helper
  • Little Helper
  • 338 posts

Posted 03 February 2016 - 03:00 PM

View PostMystere, on 03 February 2016 - 02:57 PM, said:


And why did PGI do so in those past instances? Again, pay attention to the relevant facts.

*comments on two separate types of incidents*
"Singular! SINGULAR!!"
"But one of them happened several times"
"THPPBT"

Lol. Ok, you win at Calvinball, have fun.

#384 Mystere

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 22,783 posts
  • LocationClassified

Posted 03 February 2016 - 03:02 PM

View Postcdlord, on 03 February 2016 - 02:59 PM, said:

Relevant facts.. OK.

This is not the first time, nor is it the second, nor the third that PGI has done something at the request of a comp team regardless of what the rest of us dirty lore purist casuals would think.

Moving MS is moot. Doing another thing for a comp team where others are being ignored.. THAT is paramount.

View PostMystere, on 03 February 2016 - 02:57 PM, said:

And why did PGI do so in those past instances?


********************


View PostMead, on 03 February 2016 - 03:00 PM, said:

*comments on two separate types of incidents*
"Singular! SINGULAR!!"
"But one of them happened several times"
"THPPBT"

Lol. Ok, you win at Calvinball, have fun.


Translation: I don't know the background on why PGI did it before but I'm lumping it with this one.

Hilarious.

Edited by Mystere, 03 February 2016 - 03:02 PM.


#385 Khereg

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 919 posts
  • LocationDenver, CO

Posted 03 February 2016 - 03:03 PM

Another relevant question...

If you think what was done was inappropriate, who bears primary responsibility? -MS- for making the offer, or PGI for accepting it?

Primary responsibility, not exclusive (i.e who was MORE in the wrong here?)...

Edited by Khereg, 03 February 2016 - 03:04 PM.


#386 Kin3ticX

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The People's Hero
  • The People
  • 2,926 posts
  • LocationSalt Mines of Puglandia

Posted 03 February 2016 - 03:05 PM

View PostSandpit, on 03 February 2016 - 10:15 AM, said:


and I don't think the blowback is big enough. PGI needs to start paying attention to their community outside of Twitter
period

Every single person in this thread SHOULD be blowing up Russ' twitter feed about it.


Just because Russ **** all over your forum post on twitter doesnt mean you are right in this instance.

https://twitter.com/...721252794929153

Edited by Kin3ticX, 03 February 2016 - 03:14 PM.


#387 Mystere

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 22,783 posts
  • LocationClassified

Posted 03 February 2016 - 03:06 PM

View PostKhereg, on 03 February 2016 - 03:03 PM, said:

Another relevant question...

If you think what was done was inappropriate, who bears primary responsibility? -MS- for making the offer, or PGI for accepting it?

Primary responsibility, not exclusive (i.e who was MORE in the wrong here?)...


No one?

<I know! I know! It's not what you wanted to see. But I just couldn't resist.>

Edited by Mystere, 03 February 2016 - 03:06 PM.


#388 Tina Benoit

    Community Manager

  • Developer
  • Developer
  • 817 posts

Posted 03 February 2016 - 03:14 PM

Hello there,

This thread will be locked now and would like to re-direct you to this one: http://mwomercs.com/...break-requests/





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users