Petition 4 Carebear Camo Color Channels On Kodiak.
#41
Posted 09 February 2016 - 04:29 PM
Thoughtful Cub Camo
Oh and +1 for the camo and color.
#42
Posted 09 February 2016 - 04:31 PM
#44
Posted 09 February 2016 - 04:48 PM
Love and care have no place in battletech!! Stick to the lore dude!
#46
Posted 09 February 2016 - 04:48 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 09 February 2016 - 01:15 PM, said:
If they simply make the belly, nose and ears a tertiary channel, how can they control or be responsible for what we do with it?
City of Heroes / City of Villains would like to have a word with you.
PGI can get in trouble, or at the very least can be forced to admin/moderate your builds if the copyright owners are sufficiently miffed. Though I suspect that this would be pretty far afield and probably not worth pursuing (for the copyright holders).
#48
Posted 09 February 2016 - 04:52 PM
rainbow kodiak here i come
#49
Posted 09 February 2016 - 04:52 PM
( a lot of lolliness, tho... )
#50
Posted 09 February 2016 - 04:56 PM
armyunit, on 09 February 2016 - 04:48 PM, said:
Love and care have no place in battletech!! Stick to the lore dude!
THIS is the totally true to lore mech of Captain Gregg Oliphant of the Eridani Light Horse.
Then you have Captain Vanity Torres, of Camacho's Caballeros, who pilots an anodized gold plated Battlemaster dubbed Golden Vanity.
You don't want to try to use Lore to stop me. Lore is on MY side.
Stefka Kerensky, on 09 February 2016 - 04:52 PM, said:
( a lot of lolliness, tho... )
Well, folks have been trying to kill off lore and immersion in favor of "mah bettur shooter" for 3 plus years, so don't see the issue.... except it actually is not against lore immersion!
Roadkill, on 09 February 2016 - 04:48 PM, said:
PGI can get in trouble, or at the very least can be forced to admin/moderate your builds if the copyright owners are sufficiently miffed. Though I suspect that this would be pretty far afield and probably not worth pursuing (for the copyright holders).
City of Heroes by nature already put itself in line to have potential conflicts because ya know... Superheroes.
Stompy Robots and Greeting cards? No reasonable expectation of infringement.
#51
Posted 09 February 2016 - 05:04 PM
#53
Posted 09 February 2016 - 05:23 PM
However
Edited by CK16, 09 February 2016 - 05:25 PM.
#54
Posted 09 February 2016 - 05:25 PM
i can only hope this is one of Bishops twisted jokes, and if so GJ sir, i have laughed today and for that i thank you
if its not and your serious Bishop.........we need to discuss what your smoking......and where i can get some.
#55
Posted 09 February 2016 - 06:05 PM
#56
Posted 09 February 2016 - 06:58 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 09 February 2016 - 01:06 PM, said:
Needs to be bumpin some Blue Flowers. Could be a cockpit item???
Bass to 11. Get yo creep on.
#57
Posted 09 February 2016 - 07:00 PM
#58
Posted 09 February 2016 - 07:21 PM
#59
Posted 09 February 2016 - 07:32 PM
5 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users