Jump to content

The Archer And Lrms


42 replies to this topic

#41 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 26 February 2016 - 02:51 PM

View PostCathy, on 26 February 2016 - 02:42 PM, said:

that needs to be the mech mentioned tonight !


We need something BESIDE another Heavy tonight.

If we didn't have the archer, I'd be all for it ( I think the Crusader is a better robot), but as is?. Meh. Moar Mediums now please!!!

#42 wanderer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Civil Servant
  • Civil Servant
  • 11,152 posts
  • LocationStomping around in a giant robot, of course.

Posted 27 February 2016 - 09:23 AM

And lo, your wish was granted.We got the PHX. :)

In other thoughts, it's likely we see not one but two potential NARC-quirk-friendly chassis here, with the less specialized one being the -5S. Depending on tube count in the arms, it reminds me of an oversized Kintaro in terms of potential builds. You could do 5x5 and still pack a respectable amount of energy weaponry on it, and the Archer CT mounts mean you can build it with a standard engine and basically keep fighting until you're a CT-cored donut.

The -2R confuses me, though. A 'Mech with stock LRM 20's with only a single missile hardpoint in one torso, but two in the other?

#43 Ted Wayz

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,913 posts
  • LocationTea with Romano

Posted 27 February 2016 - 11:00 AM

There will QQ if it is a good Lurm boat. Of course there will be QQ if it is a bad Lurm boat.

Hopefully it hits the sweet spot of being good enough to please the Lurmers but no so good that people think the sky is falling.

Eh, who am I kidding? There will be tears either way.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users