Jump to content

Lrms Vs. Direct Fire Video

Started by Gyrok, Feb 29 2016 09:49 AM

  • You cannot reply to this topic
141 replies to this topic

#141 Wildstreak

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Civil Servant
  • Civil Servant
  • 5,154 posts

Posted 03 March 2016 - 11:19 AM

View PostGyrok, on 01 March 2016 - 05:08 PM, said:

Someone had to be staring at those mechs for you to drop them...just saying.

NARC.
You know better.

#142 wanderer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Civil Servant
  • Civil Servant
  • 11,152 posts
  • LocationStomping around in a giant robot, of course.

Posted 03 March 2016 - 12:29 PM

Quote

He is missing the whole point of LRMs. They can be fired without the enemy being able to shoot back at you. They are also a low skill weapon which many people site as allowing friends and relatives with cerebral Palsy and other handicaps to be able to play MWO.


And even then, it's lower skill to aim- and correspondingly spreads damage. The skill involved is more positioning than being able to put your crosshairs on robot and watch the lasers hit precisely where aimed, of course.

Anyone who wants an example of the skill required in LRM use can point straight at the classic example of a trash-tier lurmer...the guy who parks himself at excessive ranges, fails to predict cover, and exclusively relies on hiding behind his team while mashing the launch key and going "I'M HELPING!".

Of those skills, he has none.
Back to General Discussion · Next Unread Topic →


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users