Missile Question
#1
Posted 01 March 2016 - 02:17 PM
Since it isn't an attribute obtainable by other means I'd like to know in advance whether it's worth looking specifically for high velocity quirks for a missile mech.
For reference when I build a missler(and I always build one or two in mechwarrior games) I tend to think of my mech as mobile artillery. Dropping large amounts of burst damage at once and moving so opponents can't just backtrack that long stream of chained missiles to my position.So I tend to volley all at once or two launchers at a time so that when i have a solid lock i get a burst of damage instead of a stream that may or may not be interrupted and can change positions sooner.
#2
Posted 01 March 2016 - 02:34 PM
... Okay, makes sense you'd ask then, cuz that sorta stuff's real hard to figure just by playing. Hopefully someone else'll done an actual test or something.
*Waits somewhat patiently to see if anyone else knows.*
~Leone.
#3
Posted 01 March 2016 - 02:47 PM
I wouldn't chose a missile mech based solely on velocity buffs. Hardpoints (both for the missiles and backup weapons) and cooldown quirks are much more important.
#4
Posted 01 March 2016 - 02:49 PM
The longer your missiles take to hit the target, the easier AMS can hit them, so a faster set of missiles could slip in some more missiles without them being shot down.
#5
Posted 01 March 2016 - 02:52 PM
#6
Posted 01 March 2016 - 03:43 PM
As a rule of thumb, never fire LRM farther than the target retension time. So 3.5 seconds.
560 m with normal missiles or
616 m with 10% speed and
672 m with 20% speed.
Now the AMS issue. Most people do not run AMS, hell most people do not run radar deprivation.
It is a good point, so do not chain fire LRMs at a mech with two AMS, especially LRM 5's. They will just stand there and eat them up. Just volley fire two or three launchers and be-dammed the ghost heat for a bit, then reality sets in and just fire two when it gets too hot. Me, I will stand under a bridge and let them keep on firing, you would be surprised how many people do not notice that I have not been hit after hundreds of LRMs. It is especially funny when they are TAGing you with 3 LRM boats at 600 m and you are just nailing them with LL's, ERLL's or AC rounds. The one problem is you have to stop firing or make tactical misses so that they do not stop wasting LRMs on you. Faster missiles means that more will get through unless there is a kit fox with 3 AMS with AMS range extension, and AMS rate of fire buffs. Forget ECM those buggers can shut down a missile boat or a group that brings 12 AMS and they move as a team.
#7
Posted 01 March 2016 - 04:40 PM
Looks like I'm gonna have to buy a maddog and test try it out, I'm not quite ready to hop over to IS mechs yet....and so my list of mechs to get gets ever longer.
#8
Posted 01 March 2016 - 07:50 PM
Speed on LRMs is way better than Cooldown .
90% of the time you will have couple seconds to fire and land LRMs . Cooldown will not help you unless you have a lock on uninterrupted which is unlikely unless enemy sucks or your team is overpowering them .
Most of the game you getting maybe 1-2 Full salvos each time you get opportunity (optimistically) How many times good players will dodge entire LRM salvo by split second ? A lot . ( speed helps )
I mean if you really taking advantage of 10-15% Cooldown on LRMs then enemy is doing something wrong or you already ahead and your teammates can finish them of anyway . Not saying Cooldown is bad but LRM velocity is very effective .
LRM speed will help in close games where you need to soften enemy up when most of players are alive
Yes LRM speed is very good . It can mean the difference between 50 damage and zero damage .
Edited by MadCat02, 01 March 2016 - 07:59 PM.
#9
Posted 01 March 2016 - 08:46 PM
Consider that each AMS shot is 0.1 damage, and a missile has 1 hp. This means that 10 shots need to hit (and destroy) the missile before it will switch to the next - or the missile hits first, and then it switches to the next missile. That next missile is then in a position which cannot be hit successfully by 10 shots of AMS, and this same sequence of events cascades into total AMS failure. Velocity, by making missiles travel faster, increases the range at which an AMS will be overwhelmed.
#10
Posted 01 March 2016 - 09:33 PM
A word of caution about the Maddog, it has huuuuge side torsos. If you are going to use SRMs, deadsiding is a very valid strategy. When your ST is shot after being destroyed, only 50% of the damage is passed on to the CT.
Edited by John1352, 01 March 2016 - 09:37 PM.
#11
Posted 02 March 2016 - 11:15 AM
MadCat02, on 01 March 2016 - 07:50 PM, said:
Speed on LRMs is way better than Cooldown .
90% of the time you will have couple seconds to fire and land LRMs . Cooldown will not help you unless you have a lock on uninterrupted which is unlikely unless enemy sucks or your team is overpowering them .
Most of the game you getting maybe 1-2 Full salvos each time you get opportunity (optimistically) How many times good players will dodge entire LRM salvo by split second ? A lot . ( speed helps )
I mean if you really taking advantage of 10-15% Cooldown on LRMs then enemy is doing something wrong or you already ahead and your teammates can finish them of anyway . Not saying Cooldown is bad but LRM velocity is very effective .
LRM speed will help in close games where you need to soften enemy up when most of players are alive
Yes LRM speed is very good . It can mean the difference between 50 damage and zero damage .
That is fine and good, but put into practice: 10-20% speed boost into an already very slow moving projectile is not going to translate into much of an advantage. Could it translate into getting a hit vs. not? Sure, but sporadic shots of opportunity should not be the focus of a lurm boat. Ultimately, position will trump velocity and arguably even cool-down.
Now when velocity is used on SRMs it means not having to lead a moving target as much. That is much more useful IMO.
#12
Posted 02 March 2016 - 11:53 AM
#13
Posted 05 March 2016 - 02:36 PM
#14
Posted 08 March 2016 - 07:06 AM
It can be difficult to figure out which pod goes with which quirk in the in-game store. Smurfy's has them all listed out here:
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...irks_heavy_clan
Also here's a decent LRM guide: http://mwomercs.com/...studies-in-lrm/
#15
Posted 08 March 2016 - 08:20 AM
Dekallis, on 01 March 2016 - 04:40 PM, said:
Looks like I'm gonna have to buy a maddog and test try it out, I'm not quite ready to hop over to IS mechs yet....and so my list of mechs to get gets ever longer.
John1352, on 01 March 2016 - 09:33 PM, said:
A word of caution about the Maddog, it has huuuuge side torsos. If you are going to use SRMs, deadsiding is a very valid strategy. When your ST is shot after being destroyed, only 50% of the damage is passed on to the CT.
I would like to add that while large front torsos do not spread damage well especially from the side, most of mwo's best mechs "suffer" from this trait which is probably among their greatest advantages. Channel 90% or greater armor to the front and tank like a beast. Since the plan is long range enjoy the advantage of extremely high forward armor and do not let enemies get behind you. This is why Timber wolves are so great in the hands of long time players (and why the mad cat (tbr) is just so awfully easy to frag in some tier 4 matches when they fail to forward the armor).
#16
Posted 08 March 2016 - 10:51 AM
LRM's for the most part, are for mediums, and fast heavies that can re position well and has slots for extra back up weapons, like medium lasers or MPL's. I'd look at that before i took into question any missile quirk on them.
HBK 4J, wolverine 7K, trebuchet, Quick Draw, Kintaro, catapults, and lastly stalkers,, (but stalkers i never use more than a pair of 10's, outside of the 3H which runs a pair of 20's along with 4 lasers i think..) Typically LRM's and assaults are not the best, but i just enjoy stalkers with a few, and awesomes can also run them with degrees of success. Just remember, don't sit back in the heavier mechs.. push to at least that medium range.
#17
Posted 08 March 2016 - 11:01 AM
Significantly more important however is getting into a position where you have that clear un-interrupted lock to start with..
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users