Jump to content

Stock Builds With Case/xl


6 replies to this topic

#1 102_devill

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary Rank 3
  • Mercenary Rank 3
  • 140 posts

Posted 17 March 2016 - 07:02 AM

Can anyone explain to me why PGI is releasing stock mech builds (like one of the archers) which feature C.A.S.E. together with an XL engine? (I am talking about IS mechs)

As far as I understand there is no possible fitting of CASE which can be beneficial in an XL-equipped IS mech. It is a simple waste of tonnage and space.

So, how come PGI still makes stock mechs like this?

Isn't this misdirecting new players? And, isn't it wrong from the TT point of view?

#2 QuantumButler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 4,534 posts
  • LocationTaiwan, One True China

Posted 17 March 2016 - 07:03 AM

View PostRokerSaMoravu, on 17 March 2016 - 07:02 AM, said:

Can anyone explain to me why PGI is releasing stock mech builds (like one of the archers) which feature C.A.S.E. together with an XL engine? (I am talking about IS mechs)

As far as I understand there is no possible fitting of CASE which can be beneficial in an XL-equipped IS mech. It is a simple waste of tonnage and space.

So, how come PGI still makes stock mechs like this?

Isn't this misdirecting new players? And, isn't it wrong from the TT point of view?


Gotta stick to muh tabletop lore bro.

#3 dervishx5

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Workhorse
  • The Workhorse
  • 3,473 posts

Posted 17 March 2016 - 07:04 AM

In Battletech, it would mean that techs could later salvage the mech rather than scraping together pieces from a smoking crater.

PGI simply takes the battletech designs and puts them in. In tabletop it makes sense to have it. They're just being thorough.

Edited by dervishx5, 17 March 2016 - 07:05 AM.


#4 Monkey Lover

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 7,918 posts
  • LocationWazan

Posted 17 March 2016 - 07:06 AM

Give you cases to sell :P

#5 102_devill

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary Rank 3
  • Mercenary Rank 3
  • 140 posts

Posted 17 March 2016 - 07:15 AM

View Postdervishx5, on 17 March 2016 - 07:04 AM, said:

In Battletech, it would mean that techs could later salvage the mech rather than scraping together pieces from a smoking crater.

PGI simply takes the battletech designs and puts them in. In tabletop it makes sense to have it. They're just being thorough.


Thanks for the clarification mate.

I still can't wrap my head around the PGI's capacity to completely disregard some rules, while sticking to other rules in a very serious obsessive-compulsive way...

#6 dervishx5

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Workhorse
  • The Workhorse
  • 3,473 posts

Posted 17 March 2016 - 07:17 AM

View PostRokerSaMoravu, on 17 March 2016 - 07:15 AM, said:


Thanks for the clarification mate.

I still can't wrap my head around the PGI's capacity to completely disregard some rules, while sticking to other rules in a very serious obsessive-compulsive way...


That fixed active probe in the Mist Lynx is OP. PGI plz nerf.

#7 Barantor

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 2,592 posts
  • LocationLexington, KY USA

Posted 17 March 2016 - 07:17 AM

It would be nice if case meant we didn't have to pay as much in repai..... nevermind....





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users