Mark Nicholson, on 13 October 2017 - 07:06 PM, said:
Ah. You said box, so I was confused if it was missing something. Yes, I'm aware that the snout is not as bulbous as in the TRO art, or the MW4 model. I followed the direction provided carefully, both the concept, and the orthographic drawings (not yet released, sorry) clearly depicted a lack of the bulbousness found in the TRO.
Eh... The less bulbous CT is probably better for the mechs hitboxes...
Though, to be honest, i think it's less of a problem than those square lasers... But it seems they're not going away ever...
On topic though, Nightstar looks ballers as fudge.
And i personally prefer the slightly down-angled arms, makes it look a bit less awkward, but it's probably fine either way.
Though, i am very.... VERY... suspicious of how well the mechs will be animated with the horrid animations that Uziel and Mad mk2 got.
Mad got slightly improved, though, not by much, and Uziel will probably be forgotten.
Edited by Juodas Varnas, 13 October 2017 - 11:34 PM.