Aleksandr Sergeyevich Kerensky, on 12 April 2016 - 04:10 PM, said:
Well... While I understand most assaults have STDs... Im surprised when i see a banshee with an STD...
While its true, when you see 5 LPL 2 slas banshee... You immediatelly think XL... I find that i still end up coring them or legging them instead of XLing them...
Their ct core is a bullet magnet...
If I see 5x LPLs on a Banshee it's an extremely high probability that it's XL.
So you call "Alpha, Banshee, XL" over TS.
What happens then is your team either straight up focuses a side torso - or more importantly when they get a rear/side angle they know where to shoot for a faster take down.
Being well designed to protect STs, doesn't mean you can always protect STs.
A target having XL doesn't mean we're always going to target the ST, it means we have another clear option for a kill if there is armor stripped there or similar.
The goal is always knowing the fastest way to remove an enemy mech.
Aleksandr Sergeyevich Kerensky, on 12 April 2016 - 04:10 PM, said:
Their ct core is a bullet magnet...
These are the hitboxes, those STs are by no means "small".
FupDup, on 12 April 2016 - 05:08 PM, said:
Legs can't be protected, while torsos usually can be via twisting. Also, especially on assaults, people might strip down the leg armor...
I disagree with this, you are still spending a lot of energy cutting out both legs while the mech retains full weapon functionality - and this is also assuming that the mech isn't peeking over hills with legs totally obscured in the first place.
It's extremely rare for it to be the better option than taking out a torso location.