Jump to content

Let's Get Hyped For Iic Mechs! - Why Another Iic Mech Pack Should Be In The Game

BattleMechs Balance General

47 replies to this topic

#21 ScoutMaster

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Caladbolg
  • Caladbolg
  • 204 posts

Posted 28 April 2016 - 09:47 PM

Maybe make the orion IIC and huglander IIC viable through quirks first then think about more IIC mechs? Those 2 mechs are steaming piles of dog feces. (The orion has peanuts in it )

#22 ice trey

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,523 posts
  • LocationFukushima, Japan

Posted 28 April 2016 - 09:54 PM

I would be totally OK with the offerings made by the OP. Seems to mesh well with the canon, and I'm happy seeing a 1/1/1/1 tonnage distribution. The decision to release four heavies in a row Mad/Whm/Rfl/Arc - and then have an event about them - meant that the heavy cue got viciously clogged up - more than it already was.

Other alternatives I'd suggest for the Assaults would be the Marauder IIC and the Phoenix Hawk IIC. PHIIC has never been seen in a PC game, but I imagine that clanners would love an assault mech with lots of torso ballistic slots and jump capability.

#23 BD RAIDR

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The Raider
  • The Raider
  • 133 posts

Posted 28 April 2016 - 10:24 PM

View Postice trey, on 28 April 2016 - 09:54 PM, said:

Other alternatives I'd suggest for the Assaults would be the Marauder IIC and the Phoenix Hawk IIC. PHIIC has never been seen in a PC game, but I imagine that clanners would love an assault mech with lots of torso ballistic slots and jump capability.


And an engine we could swap. May kill the Gargles, but I certainly wouldn't mind.

#24 Black Ivan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 1,698 posts

Posted 28 April 2016 - 10:40 PM

No, as long as the new IICs come without Quirks simply no. Orion IIC and Highlander IIC are a pain to play compared to their Quirk IS cousins who have quirks.

#25 DovisKhan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 872 posts

Posted 28 April 2016 - 10:48 PM

View PostMetus regem, on 28 April 2016 - 05:10 PM, said:

You sir, are Awesome. I love that you went with the Warhammer IIC rather than the Marauder IIC.


To hell with you warhammer, Marauder FTW!

#26 Widowmaker1981

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Widow Maker
  • The Widow Maker
  • 5,031 posts
  • LocationAt the other end of the pretty lights.

Posted 28 April 2016 - 11:52 PM

View PostBlack Ivan, on 28 April 2016 - 10:40 PM, said:

No, as long as the new IICs come without Quirks simply no. Orion IIC and Highlander IIC are a pain to play compared to their Quirk IS cousins who have quirks.


Geometry and hardpoint locations are far, far, far more important than tech tree, and the ON1-IIC and HGN-IIC have crappy geometry and crappy hardpoints, like their IS cousins. That does not mean ALL IIC mechs have crappy geometry and crappy hardpoints.

Jesus, people need to stop confusing correlation with causation.

Idiots:

HGN-IIC and ONI1-IIC suck! therefore IIC = suck!

Non idiots:

HGN-IIC and ON1-IIC suck, therefore those two specific mechs have crap geometry and hardpoints. Can we have some IICs with good geo and hardpoints please?

Edited by Widowmaker1981, 28 April 2016 - 11:52 PM.


#27 BD RAIDR

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The Raider
  • The Raider
  • 133 posts

Posted 29 April 2016 - 01:01 AM

I've had a lot of success with the Orion IIC and Highlander IIC. No complaints here.

Since PGI released the IICs, I was hoping they would follow up with a whole bunch more this year, but it's not looking likely. Still hopeful that they will release more of them eventually.

Edited by BD RAIDR, 29 April 2016 - 01:03 AM.


#28 Metus regem

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Sureshot
  • The Sureshot
  • 10,282 posts
  • LocationNAIS College of Military Science OCS courses

Posted 29 April 2016 - 04:13 AM

View PostDovisKhan, on 28 April 2016 - 10:48 PM, said:


To hell with you warhammer, Marauder FTW!


Never been a fan of the Marauder family, but been in love with the Warhammer family since I first saw SDF Macross when I was 10. As far as CBT goes, the Warhammer is the one Mech I can truly depend on in a do or die moment, they have never failed me.

#29 Valdarion Silarius

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Giant Helper
  • Giant Helper
  • 1,691 posts
  • LocationWubbing and dakkaing everyone in best jellyfish mech

Posted 29 April 2016 - 08:52 AM

Bumping with a 3D printed model of the rifleman IIC. Next to it is an executioner for scale. I have plans to get the warhammer IIC made next, with possibly the other iic models in the future.

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

#30 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 29 April 2016 - 02:25 PM

View PostWidowmaker1981, on 28 April 2016 - 11:52 PM, said:

Can we have some IICs with good geo and hardpoints please?


Locust. II. C!

#31 WrathOfDeadguy

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Pest
  • The Pest
  • 1,951 posts

Posted 29 April 2016 - 02:58 PM

Urbie IIC first. The dirty Clanners also deserve a way to take out the trash in style.

#32 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 29 April 2016 - 04:56 PM

View PostWrathOfDeadguy, on 29 April 2016 - 02:58 PM, said:

Urbie IIC first. The dirty Clanners also deserve a way to take out the trash in style.


You mean get dunked in the trash in style?

Because getting dunked is the only thing Clans should be good for, bunch of gutless cowards.

#33 Valdarion Silarius

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Giant Helper
  • Giant Helper
  • 1,691 posts
  • LocationWubbing and dakkaing everyone in best jellyfish mech

Posted 30 April 2016 - 08:08 AM

View PostWidowmaker1981, on 28 April 2016 - 11:52 PM, said:


Geometry and hardpoint locations are far, far, far more important than tech tree, and the ON1-IIC and HGN-IIC have crappy geometry and crappy hardpoints, like their IS cousins. That does not mean ALL IIC mechs have crappy geometry and crappy hardpoints.

Jesus, people need to stop confusing correlation with causation.

Idiots:

HGN-IIC and ONI1-IIC suck! therefore IIC = suck!

Non idiots:

HGN-IIC and ON1-IIC suck, therefore those two specific mechs have crap geometry and hardpoints. Can we have some IICs with good geo and hardpoints please?


The idiots that you are referring to probably only have limited experience with IICs through unfortunately, mechwarrior online. I wouldn't blame anyone who has limited experience to the franchise only through this game, to make a claim that IIC clan mechs suck based on one pack. They probably also think that clan mechs suck in general based on how overly nerfed they are in the game.

View PostMetus regem, on 28 April 2016 - 05:10 PM, said:

You sir, are Awesome. I love that you went with the Warhammer IIC rather than the Marauder IIC.


I'm probably going to add the marauder IIC through another pack in TT sim. Posted Image But I've always been a fan of the warhammer iic's original artwork and tanky appearance. I've always felt that the Marauder IIC judging by the artwork couldn't take more than a few auto cannon rounds with those chicken legs.

Posted Image

If they were going to implement the marauder iic into mwo, I hope they follow Bishop Steiner's concept artwork instead. Now that looks like a beefy war machine.

Posted Image

Edited by Arnold The Governator, 30 April 2016 - 08:13 AM.


#34 Alan Davion

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Determined
  • The Determined
  • 2,333 posts

Posted 30 April 2016 - 08:14 AM

View PostGreyNovember, on 28 April 2016 - 08:09 PM, said:

The Locust sounds like power creep to the extreme. Myst lynx can go suck it, and commandos can rot in a corner.

Or I've forgotten exactly how fragile 25 tonners are that aren't humanoid.


The Commando IIC would like a word with you.

That aside there would be enough for a 2nd and 3rd IIC 4-mech pack, problem is they really seem to be moving away from the 4-mech packs and settling on a 1-mech-a-month system.

#35 Jack Spade Ward

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 432 posts
  • LocationEarth

Posted 30 April 2016 - 08:27 AM

IIC mechs coming out would be good only as eye-candy...
considering those are pretty bad mechs (with the exception of only 2 of them) why would you want IIC mechs on the game? In fact, any clan mech?

#36 Yosharian

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • 1,656 posts

Posted 30 April 2016 - 09:06 AM

No way are you dirty clanners getting the Locust...

#37 Valdarion Silarius

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Giant Helper
  • Giant Helper
  • 1,691 posts
  • LocationWubbing and dakkaing everyone in best jellyfish mech

Posted 30 April 2016 - 09:21 AM

View PostSpadejack, on 30 April 2016 - 08:27 AM, said:

IIC mechs coming out would be good only as eye-candy...
considering those are pretty bad mechs (with the exception of only 2 of them) why would you want IIC mechs on the game? In fact, any clan mech?


Well in the pack that I suggested, most of the mechs have good geometry and hardpoints, like the Rifleman IIC's high energy arm mounted weapons and the Shadow Hawk IIC 7's shoulder cannon. As of right now, there are currently NO clan mechs in game that boast high weapon mounts that fill the support role of a IS jagermech/rifleman.

In spite to your claim that 'IIC mechs are pretty bad mechs with the exception of two of them', I think you are missing the point that we would also want these mechs because we grew up with games like Mechwarrior 2 and Mechwarrior 2: Ghost Bear's Legacy. We've experimented with different load outs and already understand what our nostalgia mechs are capable of on the battlefield.

People would want the Warhammer IIC and Rifleman IIC for the fact they are hard-to-crit tanky mechs. People would want the locust IIC by itself for it's hardpoints and geometry. People would want the Shadow Hawk IIC for it's shoulder mounted canon variant, and simply for the fact that it is a good clan medium.

Edited by Arnold The Governator, 30 April 2016 - 09:26 AM.


#38 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 30 April 2016 - 11:34 AM

View PostGreyNovember, on 28 April 2016 - 08:09 PM, said:

The Locust sounds like power creep to the extreme. Myst lynx can go suck it, and commandos can rot in a corner.

Or I've forgotten exactly how fragile 25 tonners are that aren't humanoid.


A.) It's gonna be hot with 8x cERSL and an engine large enough to make it worth being a 25 tonner and not a 30-35 tonner.

B.) As a Locust, it's more of a walking CT than the Jenner.

C.) No quirks!

#39 Charles Sennet

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Hero of Diamond Shark
  • Hero of Diamond Shark
  • 387 posts
  • LocationCurrently obscured by ECM

Posted 30 April 2016 - 02:47 PM

All I can say is yes. Seyla.

#40 Valdarion Silarius

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Giant Helper
  • Giant Helper
  • 1,691 posts
  • LocationWubbing and dakkaing everyone in best jellyfish mech

Posted 01 May 2016 - 06:30 PM

Bumping with a special present for you Marauder fanboys out there.

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image





5 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users