


Giant Catapult 3D Print
#41
Posted 04 June 2016 - 01:25 AM

#42
Posted 04 June 2016 - 05:22 AM


#43
Posted 04 June 2016 - 06:34 AM
#44
Posted 10 June 2016 - 08:27 AM
#46
Posted 10 June 2016 - 09:42 AM
#47
Posted 10 June 2016 - 03:42 PM
#48
Posted 10 June 2016 - 06:19 PM
ChapeL, on 19 May 2016 - 02:44 PM, said:
There is obviously something I am not considering and I'm curious.
As long as the people making these are not selling them there is no issue as neither PGI or the party holding the merchandising rights (Topps?) suffer any financial loss.
#49
Posted 10 June 2016 - 06:33 PM
p4r4g0n, on 10 June 2016 - 06:19 PM, said:
Strange thing with creative rights and copyrights.
You can draw/create something and sell it, even if it isn't of your original work/design. As long as it isn't an exact copy (AKA: You didn't just draw (even freehand) the exact picture from panel 3 page 5 of comic issue 4 of...) and was done completely by hand, you can sell it. (One example: If I was to draw an Ironman Fanart, and then sell it at a convention, I can do so.) I believe it also can't say the character's/whatever's name on it. (Such as stated example Ironman fanart for sale? Can't have "Ironman" plastered on it anywhere.)
In the case of this project:
- The base file was created by hand from one person. That design was for sale as a 3d printer format.
- The file was bought, and then printed at someone's home. Than assembled, posed and painted.
- If the person who printed, posed and painted the product went to sell it, they could so do as "creative work". As it is not to any scale of a game, it also is fine as far as being compared to TT minies. (Basically, it would be charging for the material to print the model, and the effort to paint the model.)
I've done it at times. I've bought, assembled and painted Warhammer 40k models for people, and then sold said models. Of course, I charged the cost of the model kits, and the effort of my own work. (Okay. I normally do it for free for friends.)
However, selling any copyrighted work is always a "grey" area of the law. In this case, it's a giant statue, which no other company is creating and selling. Thus, I don't believe any company has any claims to that "product" at this time. (And I doubt this would be done in any amount of quantity, another factor.)
Of course, I'm also no lawyer...
#50
Posted 11 June 2016 - 03:51 AM
Tesunie, on 10 June 2016 - 06:33 PM, said:
In the case of this project:
- The base file was created by hand from one person. That design was for sale as a 3d printer format.
-snip-
Based on descriptions of other similar projects, the file / model used to create the 3D print is usually based on models extracted from MWO files and modified to fill any gaps / omissions that would be visible in an actual physical 3D model. If this is also the case here, I doubt that PGI would remain silent if models were made in commercial quantities and sold.
The bigger issue here is that the company that holds the merchandising rights to Battletech would definitely be taking action and it is not PGI as they have previously stated that they do not hold these rights, if I recall correctly. This is why PGI is not producing and selling physical 3D models themselves, MWO apparel, etc.
Not sure how NGNG is dealing with this with respect to the merchandise that they are selling but then again, it could just be that the amount of sales are insufficient to trigger any action by the respective IP owners/licensees.
Edited by p4r4g0n, 11 June 2016 - 03:52 AM.
#52
Posted 11 June 2016 - 02:06 PM
#53
Posted 12 June 2016 - 12:06 AM
Hitman85, the model pieces did came with articulation but I decided against it at the end. Since I've printed the model solid it is very very heavy fully assembled so I ended up making it into a solid statue rather than an articulated model. Just need to design a stand for it now with some build in lights and such and she will look glorious!
I am wondering if this high poly Catapult model posted on these forums here a while ago is the model they used to convert it into print friendly parts. Looks awfully similar in terms of custom details:
http://mwomercs.com/...apult-3d-model/
Edited by Solid Alexei, 12 June 2016 - 12:10 AM.
#54
Posted 14 June 2016 - 02:32 PM

#55
Posted 16 June 2016 - 11:14 AM
#56
Posted 17 June 2016 - 03:00 PM

#57
Posted 18 June 2016 - 09:10 PM
I see damage on the leg. Did you let Viking_Lass get to it?
Todd Lightbringer, on 19 May 2016 - 12:56 PM, said:
The do not have the right to do so. However their is nothing stopping players from using the game files to print out mechs for themselves. That is legal, or at least a grey area that has not become a problem to TOPPS. So long as no one tries to sell them. That is why HyperRPG can use 3D printed MWO mechs for the DFA show.
#60
Posted 19 June 2016 - 12:38 PM
http://www.coolminio...owseid=15482771
Thanks so much folks!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users