Edited by Solid Alexei, 12 October 2016 - 01:53 PM.


Giant Catapult 3D Print
#61
Posted 06 July 2016 - 02:11 AM
#62
Posted 06 July 2016 - 02:27 AM
Solid Alexei, on 06 July 2016 - 02:11 AM, said:
http://www.gambody.c...rior-model-kits
Wait... They're selling them? Is that legal? I mean, i'm pretty sure even PGI doesn't have the rights to sell them
#63
Posted 06 July 2016 - 03:48 AM
You were asking about glass. Many many moons ago, between paydays, I started messing about with models and figurines. I found one of the most versatile effects creator was water based Elmer's glue.
Thicken with some flour and mud colored paint and you could clump it for nice effect. Thinned with water you could make a sheen on something.
I like the Catapult the way you made it and think it looks great. But you did ask. Hope you find it useful.
#64
Posted 06 July 2016 - 04:04 AM
#65
Posted 06 July 2016 - 04:04 AM
Juodas Varnas, on 06 July 2016 - 02:27 AM, said:
Just the files that you use to print it out on your 3D printer if you have one. Curious about what PGI would have to say about someone selling them though.
#66
Posted 06 July 2016 - 04:28 AM
Muddflap, on 06 July 2016 - 03:48 AM, said:
You were asking about glass. Many many moons ago, between paydays, I started messing about with models and figurines. I found one of the most versatile effects creator was water based Elmer's glue.
Thicken with some flour and mud colored paint and you could clump it for nice effect. Thinned with water you could make a sheen on something.
I like the Catapult the way you made it and think it looks great. But you did ask. Hope you find it useful.
p4r4g0n, on 06 July 2016 - 04:04 AM, said:
Just the files that you use to print it out on your 3D printer if you have one. Curious about what PGI would have to say about someone selling them though.
#67
Posted 06 July 2016 - 04:37 AM
Solid Alexei, on 06 July 2016 - 04:28 AM, said:
question is also if they would care, PGI may still have the design rights, yte they have no roghts about selling toys, so at this point PGI isn't losing anything since they cannot make toys of their own. However they probably may benefit from it due to crossadvertising.
#68
Posted 06 July 2016 - 06:24 AM
Lily from animove, on 06 July 2016 - 04:37 AM, said:
. However they probably may benefit from it due to crossadvertising.
very very true
a couple of news articles about the model:
http://3dprintingind...3d-model-84252/
http://www.3ders.org...r-catapult.html
Edited by Solid Alexei, 06 July 2016 - 06:24 AM.
#69
Posted 06 July 2016 - 06:56 AM


#70
Posted 06 July 2016 - 07:06 AM
Solid Alexei, on 06 July 2016 - 06:24 AM, said:
a couple of news articles about the model:
http://3dprintingind...3d-model-84252/
http://www.3ders.org...r-catapult.html
I need a NVA with various wepaons that I can magnetize with neodyn magnets

#71
Posted 06 July 2016 - 07:48 AM


#72
Posted 06 July 2016 - 08:03 AM
#73
Posted 06 July 2016 - 09:15 AM
Lily from animove, on 06 July 2016 - 04:37 AM, said:
question is also if they would care, PGI may still have the design rights, yte they have no roghts about selling toys, so at this point PGI isn't losing anything since they cannot make toys of their own. However they probably may benefit from it due to crossadvertising.
That's not quite how copyright laws work. There's a set of 4 tests that need to be applied. One is "is there a financial gain" (in this case there is), and another is material similarity (pretty obvious considering they use the words "Mechwarrior" and "Catapult" and... well just look at the model).
And even the argument that they aren't competing with something that PGI is currently making doesn't hold water, as in the event that PGI does get the rights to make physical mechs from Topps, then these people would be in direct competition and have diluted the marketplace.
There is a pretty vague line about copyright infringement that only lawyers seem to be able to find, but this one seems to be crossing a lot of those lines.
#74
Posted 06 July 2016 - 10:31 AM
Heffay, on 06 July 2016 - 09:15 AM, said:
That's not quite how copyright laws work. There's a set of 4 tests that need to be applied. One is "is there a financial gain" (in this case there is), and another is material similarity (pretty obvious considering they use the words "Mechwarrior" and "Catapult" and... well just look at the model).
And even the argument that they aren't competing with something that PGI is currently making doesn't hold water, as in the event that PGI does get the rights to make physical mechs from Topps, then these people would be in direct competition and have diluted the marketplace.
There is a pretty vague line about copyright infringement that only lawyers seem to be able to find, but this one seems to be crossing a lot of those lines.
Even if PGI never gets into making and selling physical mech models, they would appear to own the the right to license their art / models to whoever has a licence to do so. Unless I am sorely mistaken, there is probably just such a licensing arrangement with Hare Brained Games for the use of PGI art in the game HBG is developing.
#75
Posted 06 July 2016 - 10:43 AM
p4r4g0n, on 06 July 2016 - 10:31 AM, said:
That is correct, but that has nothing to do with this company selling the IP to print up models. I really doubt PGI gave them a license to do that, and I really doubt doing that without a license is going to fly legally.
HBS does have a license to use PGI's models. Gambody? We will see I guess. Maybe they do, but since they never mention PGI or Microsoft anywhere on their store... /shrug
#76
Posted 06 July 2016 - 11:45 AM
Heffay, on 06 July 2016 - 09:15 AM, said:
You could say that. I saw the Catapult model on their website and got in touch with them about a possibility of making swapable weapon packs for it. I have been advise them on that since as well as articulation and general MechWarrior info.
#77
Posted 07 July 2016 - 05:11 AM
Edited by Solid Alexei, 12 October 2016 - 01:54 PM.
#78
Posted 04 November 2016 - 08:01 AM
like i said on reddit, why is PGI not selling these already, when they work this hard to ban and mitigate everyone's access to the models.
how can they justify complaining about a lack of money when boatloads of whales would sell a kidney for a set of models in this scale or in a "large" format.
so what really is the damn issue, are they worried about the Phoenix mechs? exclude them FFS! out of the 100 or so chassis i think they have enough models to make a huge stable of products to support them even without the contentious chassis.




Edited by zudukai, 04 November 2016 - 08:03 AM.
#79
Posted 04 November 2016 - 08:49 AM
PGI has been INCREDIBLY supportive of the fan art community. They even call out particularly good print and paint jobs done by the community. Nobody else who has printed them has ever run into any troubles. However, there is a very clear line that can't be crossed, and that's what happened here.
zudukai, on 04 November 2016 - 08:01 AM, said:
Nobody else has been banned. PGI hasn't locked down the models.
#80
Posted 04 November 2016 - 08:55 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users