Some Victor Love?
#1
Posted 30 May 2016 - 04:50 PM
#2
Posted 30 May 2016 - 11:27 PM
#3
Posted 31 May 2016 - 01:31 PM
#4
Posted 31 May 2016 - 01:48 PM
I'd love an increase to the tube count for the SRM launchers, so we can fire a SRM6 in a single volley instead of 2 or 3 volleys from the bottom launcher.
It's Time
#5
Posted 04 June 2016 - 08:16 AM
The Victor at one time was one of the best mechs in the game. Now it is one of the worst. That is mostly due to quirks (lack off on this mech) and JJ fixes.
If the quirk system is really to make all mechs competitive/playable then why has the Victor gone from best to worst since the start of that system? At some point if this system is actually working as initially intended wouldn't this mech get better quirks?
In many cases I believe the call for better quirks is crazy talk, but in a mech like this which is hardly ever used because so many others are just plane better, it is probably necessary.
#7
Posted 04 June 2016 - 09:00 AM
Edited by BlackhawkSC, 04 June 2016 - 09:00 AM.
#8
Posted 04 June 2016 - 12:59 PM
Maybe someone has a build they can suggest that is a winner. I am open to trying most things. The one thing I cant see myself doing is investing 2 million or more C-bills. I do have a 275 standard, 300 standard, 300xl, 330xl and 340xl to work with. I have a fair amount of other lighter engines but don't see them working.
Edited by Rock Roller, 04 June 2016 - 01:07 PM.
#9
Posted 08 June 2016 - 02:48 PM
#10
Posted 09 June 2016 - 07:57 AM
#11
Posted 13 June 2016 - 12:32 PM
With the other Assaults that are out there I think its weapon placement and low alpha profile will be factors that are just a factor of the mech. You could get it to a place that allows it to use its maneuverability to be a force In a match. I can see it fitting a niche Assault.
Just finishing the mastering of this mech and for all its faults I like it. It was a hard introduction to Assaults though. Just about in every way my Timber Wolf kills this unit. But for a Assault it has good maneuverability. The AC20 is a blast. I can say that you have to think very hard about how you fight it if you want a good match.
Edited by Rock Roller, 13 June 2016 - 12:38 PM.
#12
Posted 18 June 2016 - 07:54 AM
#13
Posted 20 June 2016 - 05:56 AM
May Primus have mercy on their sparks.
#14
Posted 20 June 2016 - 06:26 AM
The Victor (especialy the Dragonslayer) is the everlasting, eternal monument and reminder for what happens when the meta of a game is changed by the developers using the unholy banhammer of doom.
And now my dear Mechwarror brothers and sisters behold the next victims of wrath of the devs !!!!
For the "Age of LAZORVOMIT" may be at its end !!!!!
With "The Day of Rescale and Quirkening" comming tomorrow some of our beloved mechs will already be marked and prepered for the eternal hell of meaninglessnes.
Already big mechs get even bigger, their quirks get taken away.....*dramatic pause*
And with the arival of HEATSYSTEM 2.0 the damnation of all energyheavy mechs will be upon us.
But lo there will be a new age....a new tomorrow of diverse loadouts and other heros may rise from obscurity to save the new day. To Battle.
Ok drama and hyperbole away what you see is one of the many mechs that once where usefull in MWO and now are not because the games meta changed and soon this will be the case again.
Who knows .... with a heatsystem limiting large alphas (if it does so) the Victor may very well be one of the new rising stars for its diverse loadouts.
#15
Posted 20 June 2016 - 04:28 PM
The Basilisk, on 20 June 2016 - 06:26 AM, said:
The Victor (especialy the Dragonslayer) is the everlasting, eternal monument and reminder for what happens when the meta of a game is changed by the developers using the unholy banhammer of doom.
And now my dear Mechwarror brothers and sisters behold the next victims of wrath of the devs !!!!
For the "Age of LAZORVOMIT" may be at its end !!!!!
With "The Day of Rescale and Quirkening" comming tomorrow some of our beloved mechs will already be marked and prepered for the eternal hell of meaninglessnes.
Already big mechs get even bigger, their quirks get taken away.....*dramatic pause*
And with the arival of HEATSYSTEM 2.0 the damnation of all energyheavy mechs will be upon us.
But lo there will be a new age....a new tomorrow of diverse loadouts and other heros may rise from obscurity to save the new day. To Battle.
Ok drama and hyperbole away what you see is one of the many mechs that once where usefull in MWO and now are not because the games meta changed and soon this will be the case again.
Who knows .... with a heatsystem limiting large alphas (if it does so) the Victor may very well be one of the new rising stars for its diverse loadouts.
That was a fun response! Who knows you may be right. I just mastered the chassis but I think its time to find a new ride when playing assaults for a bit. I will give the new structure quirks a shot but it seems like to little to really change anything. After a few weeks of the rescale findings I should have a clue wich way to jump.
Edited by Rock Roller, 20 June 2016 - 04:30 PM.
#16
Posted 20 June 2016 - 04:32 PM
BlackhawkSC, on 08 June 2016 - 02:48 PM, said:
BlackhawkSC. I am using your builds currently. The brawler build is my most productive build. I have tried a ton of different options and you are right this is the most effective.
#17
Posted 21 June 2016 - 03:50 PM
I don't get it - some mechs with messed up and tiny missile tube counts had the problems addressed. Others, like the Victor (and the dismally awful Pretty Baby) are stuck with crippling, tiny tube count missile launchers forever. Ugh.
#18
Posted 26 June 2016 - 04:02 PM
#19
Posted 26 June 2016 - 09:33 PM
I don't think you are asking for to much with the same structure quirks that others enjoy. You already give up tonnage for a bigger engine (that can be an advantage and a disadvantage), you give up tonnage for jump jets (same as last side note) and you have to look at the end result. You have poor Alpha ability's compared to other units, you have arm mounted weapons that are easy targets as well as being very low mounted. Boy did you also just gave up the tonnage for these advantages? So yep the balance makes total sense.
#20
Posted 13 July 2016 - 11:44 PM
And yet, I find myself doing exactly this...with the Kodiak Spirit Bear and MASC. :/
10 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 10 guests, 0 anonymous users