Dathcha the Jawa Adventurer, on 15 July 2016 - 07:57 AM, said:
This is an alt account, friend.
Clearly.
Dathcha the Jawa Adventurer, on 15 July 2016 - 07:57 AM, said:
You challenge my data, which is from two different accounts (incoming Tier 5 farming excuse - wait, it was group queue with T2 players, but group queue makes it easier somehow, but wait, I don't know what excuse to use now!), but you have NO data of your own to provide concerning the abilities of the Locust.
Well you are yet to show us all how tier 5 farming isn't a thing for your alt account. So please, keep on raging and being silly. When you are done, pray tell me what data you want from me considering I don't own Locusts on a client that gathers data.
Dathcha the Jawa Adventurer, on 15 July 2016 - 07:57 AM, said:
When I have spent over 5 6 days playing the mech, as well as many hours in other lights, you consider yourself the only relevant input here. I hope people can see your complete lack of credibility in this matter.
Funny thing is that I don't, but you'd never know that because you haven't brought a single valid argument apart from showing us some silly pictures of underhive pugstars. And if you think that opinions of people can be influenced by screaming "this guy doesn't have any credibility don't listen to him" I really pity you.
Dathcha the Jawa Adventurer, on 15 July 2016 - 07:57 AM, said:
You want me to take you seriously? Buy some Locusts. Play them. Post the stats. I'm willing to bet that even if you did try the mech, you'd be too embarrassed to post your numbers.
Gift me mechbays I'll buy all the Locusts you want. I've played them on tournament client and I don't like them, I doubt that I'd suddenly like them because of the scale difference between clients.
Dathcha the Jawa Adventurer, on 15 July 2016 - 07:57 AM, said:
Lastly, all the stats from before the resize are meant to show that the Locust was a powerful mech even back then.
LOL ... oh dear. And I think he actually believes it as well.
Dathcha the Jawa Adventurer, on 15 July 2016 - 07:57 AM, said:
The resize changed fairly little.
Riiiiiight. And if we take a Dire and suddenly make it 2 times smaller that won't change anything either. Suuuuuuure.
Dathcha the Jawa Adventurer, on 15 July 2016 - 07:57 AM, said:
You want them to resize it back to where it was, by all means, go for it.
I never said I want it. Nor did I say that I don't want it. But clearly you wouldn't know it because you don't read the discussion before making silly posts.
Dathcha the Jawa Adventurer, on 15 July 2016 - 07:57 AM, said:
Calling for nerfing it back to release-level performance is just spiteful.
I think you said that Locust was a powerful mech even before rescale. Kinda ... about 10 seconds ago. Make up your mind please.
Dathcha the Jawa Adventurer, on 15 July 2016 - 07:57 AM, said:
Sorry I'm not sorry that some 20 tonner ruined your pretty KDK-3 that you paid good money for.
And I don't own a KDK-3 (or any KDK) either. But keep making assumptions. Your "credibility" skyrockets when you do ...
Dathcha the Jawa Adventurer, on 15 July 2016 - 07:57 AM, said:
The point about the term, "data," is one I make all the time just to try and educate. Everyone knows a sentence must start with a capital letter, but most don't know that "data" is a plural term. My mistakes are from lack of caring. Yours are from (I'm assuming, here) ignorance.
Well forgive me for not being born in a country where the only true and valid language in existence is spoken on the streets. I must be a really horrible person for not being ashamed by it in the slightest. And of course it lowers my "credibility" even further. So very sad ...
... and so very typical coming from "your" people.