Jump to content

Pick A Side: Smooth Fps Or Graphic Enhancements

Gameplay General

70 replies to this topic

#21 Lily from animove

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Devoted
  • The Devoted
  • 13,891 posts
  • LocationOn a dropship to Terra

Posted 20 July 2016 - 11:23 AM

FPS, as graphics is good enough and more graphics means more people may burn through their wooden PC's.

Edited by Lily from animove, 20 July 2016 - 11:23 AM.


#22 Felicitatem Parco

    Professor of Memetics

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 13,522 posts
  • LocationIs Being Obscured By ECM

Posted 20 July 2016 - 11:29 AM

FPS

This is because the game handedly eclipses previous MW titles in the graphics department (one of the original design goals for the game), and I think smoothness during CQC is of paramount importance.

#23 DAYLEET

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 4,316 posts
  • LocationLinoleum.

Posted 20 July 2016 - 11:30 AM

Choice number one: Do you want the game not being crappy.

Choice number two: Do you want the game not being crappy.

I Vote for the game not being crappy, thank you. But i would have also added a third option "content" "game not crappy"

#24 Alistair Winter

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Storm
  • Storm
  • 10,823 posts
  • LocationBergen, Norway, FRR

Posted 20 July 2016 - 11:31 AM

FX.

Except for the fact that the latest patch butchered the FPS for a lot of people, and probably requires a hot fix at some point, I think this game is 3-4 years old and needs a face-lift. It used to be an exceptionally beautiful FPS in 2012, but in 2016 (and 2017, soon), it's just not up there anymore.

#25 The Robot Jox

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 72 posts
  • LocationEcuador

Posted 20 July 2016 - 12:48 PM

thanks for everyone that keep voting i am going to make an xl sheet later on. seems FPS is what people care about.

#26 Tyler Valentine

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Senior Corporal
  • 1,472 posts
  • LocationChandler, Arizona

Posted 20 July 2016 - 01:23 PM

Both. Spend $300 on components and you can play this game on max settings with 60fps.

#27 The Robot Jox

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 72 posts
  • LocationEcuador

Posted 20 July 2016 - 01:34 PM

View PostTyler Valentine, on 20 July 2016 - 01:23 PM, said:

Both. Spend $300 on components and you can play this game on max settings with 60fps.

Hello, this is a related post, as you can see my system is above recommended specs. But lets not deviate from the voting. =D

http://mwomercs.com/...ff/page__st__20

Edited by The Robot Jox, 20 July 2016 - 01:34 PM.


#28 vettie

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Machete
  • The Machete
  • 1,620 posts
  • LocationThe Good Ole South

Posted 20 July 2016 - 01:55 PM

To vote FPS

lucky enough to have both here

Also of note - Yesterday WAS patch day. Most likely (only a guess) loads were heavier and will be for a few days as players update whether they play or not. And it was a sizable download not to mention payload was probably heavier as people were "checking out" the patch...imo....

#29 Tarogato

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Civil Servant
  • Civil Servant
  • 6,558 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 20 July 2016 - 03:18 PM

Option 3: optimise what we already have for better fps and no loss in quality.

#30 Percimes

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Flame
  • The Flame
  • 264 posts

Posted 20 July 2016 - 03:30 PM

Until last fall I was playing on a intel Q9550. I've upgraded. I've made my choice. Now I have both.

#31 Peter2k

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 2,032 posts
  • LocationGermany

Posted 20 July 2016 - 03:36 PM

Fps

#32 Xmith

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Ironclad
  • The Ironclad
  • 1,099 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 20 July 2016 - 03:38 PM

It's not the size, it's how you use it...

The devs as you described as being small and can't possibly tap their head and rub their belly at the same time must be doing something right. There are people here saying they have good FPS and FX.

So what's your point?

#33 The Robot Jox

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 72 posts
  • LocationEcuador

Posted 20 July 2016 - 04:01 PM

View PostXmith, on 20 July 2016 - 03:38 PM, said:

It's not the size, it's how you use it...

The devs as you described as being small and can't possibly tap their head and rub their belly at the same time must be doing something right. There are people here saying they have good FPS and FX.

So what's your point?

you can vote if you like, describing my point here deviates from my original post, thanks.

#34 Ex Atlas Overlord

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • 1,018 posts

Posted 20 July 2016 - 04:02 PM

FX with conditions...

I would prefer more "minimum" graphics. Aka, I don't think people should be able to gain an advantage by turning things down....I think everything should still show on low....it should just look ultra ******.

So Fx-ish?

#35 The Robot Jox

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 72 posts
  • LocationEcuador

Posted 20 July 2016 - 04:20 PM

View PostAkulla1980, on 20 July 2016 - 10:51 AM, said:

Both, I got enough power err force Posted Image

If I could only have one its FPS.

good one mate, you see this is what i wanted to see, what does the mwo comunity value more, even if you have both you choose FPS.

View PostCathy, on 20 July 2016 - 11:02 AM, said:

I also have noth

well, like i said be nice and choose one that is more important to you.

#36 Kangarad

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • 573 posts
  • LocationIn the Mechlab, adding more Double Heatsinks.

Posted 20 July 2016 - 04:22 PM

FX

#37 GreenHell

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 543 posts
  • LocationGrandmas House

Posted 20 July 2016 - 04:46 PM

FPS!

I want at least 144 to match my monitor.

#38 Karl Marlow

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 2,277 posts

Posted 20 July 2016 - 04:47 PM

I choose melee combat

#39 JinSR

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 32 posts

Posted 20 July 2016 - 04:57 PM

FPS and stable latency.

It is a shooter (a steady shooter at that) so that means these things are just too important to give up for an extra bit of eye candy.

#40 Malcolm Vordermark

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,520 posts

Posted 20 July 2016 - 04:59 PM

FPS





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users