If Only Mwo's Flamers ...
#1
Posted 11 August 2016 - 07:50 AM
#2
Posted 11 August 2016 - 07:51 AM
#3
Posted 11 August 2016 - 07:53 AM
#4
Posted 11 August 2016 - 07:55 AM
#5
Posted 11 August 2016 - 08:04 AM
#7
Posted 11 August 2016 - 08:11 AM
El Bandito, on 11 August 2016 - 08:04 AM, said:
BattleTech flamers usually use plasma vented from the 'Mech's fusion reactor, so there is nothing what could stick on enemy 'Mech.
If you would like to see flames "stick" on enemy 'Mech, you would need Infernos. Oh, I forgot, another weapon that has not been implemented by PGI ...
#8
Posted 11 August 2016 - 08:15 AM
For that matter no one is interested in HBS either. Nope. Everything is fine. We have everything we need right here.
Pfft. Heavy Gear flammers. Who needs em.
Just going to sit back and watch the MWO population explode in the face of these lame alternatives.
Edited by Bud Crue, 11 August 2016 - 08:15 AM.
#9
Posted 11 August 2016 - 08:16 AM
Flamers went from being beautiful, but terrible, to useful, but fugly.
One step forward, one step backward. <sigh>
#10
Posted 11 August 2016 - 08:21 AM
#11
Posted 11 August 2016 - 09:03 AM
martian, on 11 August 2016 - 08:11 AM, said:
If you would like to see flames "stick" on enemy 'Mech, you would need Infernos. Oh, I forgot, another weapon that has not been implemented by PGI ...
And will be OP on releaase, useless after the nerf, meh after further balancing, then broke again after it gets "buffed back", ultimately being a pretty ******, novelty weapon that works only some of the time and doesnt fit w/e the meta will be at that time.
#12
Posted 11 August 2016 - 09:06 AM
SMDMadCow, on 11 August 2016 - 08:21 AM, said:
The last game I remember seeing infernos in had them from a separate launcher. It's been a while though...
Edited by ChapeL, 11 August 2016 - 09:09 AM.
#13
Posted 11 August 2016 - 09:07 AM
If ever the Machine guns could have some use, like the flamers do now *sigh*
#14
Posted 11 August 2016 - 09:12 AM
But now they just look ... bad. It doesn't have to be that old flame effect, and doesn't have to block vision like the old one did, just something that looks cool and interesting.
#15
Posted 11 August 2016 - 10:09 AM
Bud Crue, on 11 August 2016 - 08:15 AM, said:
For that matter no one is interested in HBS either. Nope. Everything is fine. We have everything we need right here.
Pfft. Heavy Gear flammers. Who needs em.
Just going to sit back and watch the MWO population explode in the face of these lame alternatives.
Heavy gear isn't stompy... it's skatey.
Actually as quick and mobile as heavy gear is PGI could lose a lot of the CoD types to it.
Edited by Narcissistic Martyr, 11 August 2016 - 10:09 AM.
#17
Posted 11 August 2016 - 11:16 AM
Yeah, I like aesthetic in my mechs weaponry.
As for the video, something like that would be nice, but the old flamer were good enough.
#18
Posted 11 August 2016 - 11:18 AM
#19
Posted 11 August 2016 - 11:32 AM
#20
Posted 11 August 2016 - 11:35 AM
LordKnightFandragon, on 11 August 2016 - 09:03 AM, said:
Don't underestimate PGI. What could go wrong?
ChapeL, on 11 August 2016 - 09:06 AM, said:
I believe that it was when the old BattleTech rules were in effect. Today, Infernos are just one type of SRM ammo.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



























