Quote
Ilithi: Instead of holding unit membership applications until the monthly UCC meeting, why not use the forums we have at our disposal, and have applying unit COs send a message or make a post requesting membership, and then the UCC members vote yay or nay on it.
</p>
I was thinking something similar myself. Getting all the unit commanders or their reps to be online at that exact same moment in time is, as we see, rare. I'd just as soon see the UCC meeting transition over to a UCC Forum and the votes could be polls. Has the advantage of being a-synchronous, which compensates for time differences and personal schedules.
As for speeding up the New Unit process, that's tough. We can speed up the approval process, but actually making the unit on the Website and on the TS3 server can't. Ramses says it takes about 40hrs of work to make a new unit. Some of which is on the New Unit themselves by providing graphics and icons and such. So he'll do that and then a month later that unit does not show up any more (HoM, DoA, etc.) Very frustrating from his POV. Would be easier to just re-use the old uniforms.
Quote
Ilithi: An LFG night, where we break into 4-man groups (give or take), and all hop into LFG, snatching up everyone we can.
I think you are on to something here. I will definitely speak to my unit about this...I think I have a few members that would do a good job with it.
Quote
Ilithi: One of the other things we could do, to encourage player retention, is identify the anchor players, the guys who hold groups together, attract people to play with, the guys who, when they hop off for the night or for a while, the whole group falls apart because that one person or two was anchoring it all together. Identify those people, and find ways to encourage them to stick around.
This was one of my first concerns when I was a new Unit Commander. It is why I created the Officer Rank Tags. In hopes to give them some recognition as I tend to commission my anchor players. And also to identify them to the rest of the community as leaders. I looked a little bit into seeing if I could automate the process in enjin so a unit command staff could assign them, but there seemed to be no easy way to do it. As of now, it is a manual process in the User Admin page. I was also pondering making Non-Com tags for Corporal on up, to give more active players a little reward.
Quote
Ilithi: From the perspective of a gamer looking to play a game to have fun, that makes IS vs IS matches worthwhile.
I agree. The current voting system may inhibit this, though. You'd have to get enough Marik players to vote for that IS vs IS match, right? Right now, our War Council can suggest things but that does not guarantee it, even within the FWLM let alone all of Marik. Or are we talking about Private Matches?
Quote
Lady Alexandra: So if I would happen to leave for a long period of time it starts to degrade till everything goes away and gotta start over from scratch
The bane of all small units... Only way around that is to put your unit in a good position to grow. When I inherited the 1FWG from Rohaan it was very dead. 32 members, mostly inactive. But was lucky in that I was able to build up fast as the Steam release happened a week later and I was able to get us up into the 60's within a month or two. That and we are located on a very good Teamspeak server (housemarik.enjin.com) with other Marik units. It really helps keep interest up, even though your unit members may not be around.
Edited by ShaneoftheDead, 21 August 2016 - 09:00 AM.