#41
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:25 AM
#42
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:33 AM
What it clearly is tho, is the back and front shot of a mech.
Edited by Kira Onime, 06 September 2016 - 11:38 AM.
#43
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:33 AM
For example, on the phx/kdk announcement page, there are only 13 squares. You cant make a square with only 13 squares. (need even number to even resemble a logical picture... 2, 4, 6, 8... etc)
Edited by razenWing, 06 September 2016 - 11:34 AM.
#44
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:37 AM
#45
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:40 AM
Kira Onime, on 06 September 2016 - 11:33 AM, said:
What it clearly is tho, is the back and front shot of a mech.
THAT IS FOR SURE A BUSHWACKER!!
#46
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:40 AM
Kira Onime, on 06 September 2016 - 11:33 AM, said:
What it clearly is tho, is the back and front shot of a mech.
That pretty much looks like a Bushwacker. Note the left arm LRM-5 and what looks like another left torso missile rack.
Ick.
#47
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:41 AM
#48
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:41 AM
#49
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:42 AM
#51
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:42 AM
#52
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:42 AM
#53
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:43 AM
Gas Guzzler, on 06 September 2016 - 11:40 AM, said:
THAT IS FOR SURE A BUSHWACKER!!
Some of the pictures had to be rotated just a bit.
#54
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:43 AM
Kira Onime, on 06 September 2016 - 11:33 AM, said:
What it clearly is tho, is the back and front shot of a mech.
I had a hunch when I saw the lrm 5, but with that...
Bushwacker hype! I don't even care if it's not a great mech, I just think it looks awesome and I loved it in MW3 and MW4.
#55
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:44 AM
If you guys that are supposed to be fans of it, can't see a Bushwhacker then you ain't that big a fan of it
#56
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:45 AM
Chimera11, on 06 September 2016 - 11:43 AM, said:
I fear it is going to be a bit goofier than the MW3/MW4 version though judging from what we have so far.
#57
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:47 AM
Quicksilver Kalasa, on 06 September 2016 - 11:45 AM, said:
The right arm looks a bit...odd? I'm going to try to hold my judgment on its new appearance until I see it fully. Legs do seem a bit long too, though.
Edited by Chimera11, 06 September 2016 - 11:49 AM.
#58
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:48 AM
#59
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:51 AM
Chimera11, on 06 September 2016 - 11:47 AM, said:
The legs don't bother me so much as the torso, the torso seems awfully tall and the missile attachment just seems placed rather high. The right arm does seem a bit odd but not as odd as the height of the CT.
#60
Posted 06 September 2016 - 11:51 AM
Coming out nicely
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users