BLOOD WOLF, on 17 September 2016 - 06:12 AM, said:
you keep asserting that and I don't know what else to tell you.
The first option is without a doubt positive
the second option is it improves upon previous implementations of ED and GH. and before GH, of all older heat scales, but
even has some flaws that would need to be fixed. The ED was also just updated.
the 3rd options is a no it doesn't improve anything. That is as negative as it gets.
I kinda get the impression that you don't know what positive, negative, and neutral means if you keep repeating the same thing after I have explained it multiple times.
I think you don't understand what negative and neutral mean. Here, let me help:
neg·a·tive
ˈneɡədiv/
adjective
1.(of a word, clause, or proposition) expressing denial, negation, or refutation; stating or asserting that something is not the case.
neu·tral
ˈn(y)o͞otrəl/Submit
adjective
1. not helping or supporting either side in a conflict, disagreement, etc.; impartial.
You have two answers that register differing positive results in favor of the specified ED PTS, and one neutral. Your 3rd response indicates posits that the current implementation is equal to the previous implementation - and thus is neutral. You have not allowed for any position indicating the the current implementation is WORSE than the previous one - and thus you haven't allowed any negative results against it.
Your choices are, "it's really good," "it's a little good," and "it's neither good nor bad." There is NO answer for "it's bad.
Edited by ScarecrowES, 17 September 2016 - 02:52 PM.